IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 07 September 2016 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAA112B0A0 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMXe-FU8M0Hi for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ACE712B08F for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u87KlsMA001097 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:47:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:47:53 -0500
Message-ID: <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5260)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/wNX8iW-HmaLIyN4Ujjb_mYQ1gJ8>
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:47:56 -0000

On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:45, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Definite improvements. Would you like me to submit a revised I-D? Easy 
> enough. :-)

If you agree to the changes, please do. Am I correct to assume that 
there are no more outstanding issues? If so, I think we can take that 
version to IETF last call.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email