Re: [Stox] Review of -core
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 31 July 2013 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5438221F9C7A for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.014
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.014 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.285, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iPCMw6WEPqq for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D673821F9A8C for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-2-456.cisco.com (unknown [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B77B740046; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:55:30 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51F924D9.1040707@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:53:13 +0200
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
References: <B41C24DF-D89B-47B0-98D5-C176AC13EF81@ag-projects.com> <51F91E1D.7020606@stpeter.im> <835410ED-B7B9-4DD9-8E58-8DF6C7AE4BB2@ag-projects.com> <2F1DACBC-4707-4FA5-ADE4-FFFD3709C870@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <2F1DACBC-4707-4FA5-ADE4-FFFD3709C870@edvina.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "stox@ietf.org" <stox@ietf.org>, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
Subject: Re: [Stox] Review of -core
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:59:12 -0000
On 7/31/13 4:51 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > 31 jul 2013 kl. 16:42 skrev Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com > <mailto:saul@ag-projects.com>>: > >>> >>> >>>> - Sec 5.1 maps the XMPP unexpected-request error to SIP code 491, >>>> which is very tied to the dialog semantics IMHO. I tried to find a >>>> better matching code but I couldn't though. Maybe a 500 with a >>>> reasonable Retry-After header value? >>> >>> It seems to me that we'd want it to be a 4xx series error, but I don't >>> see a good one in RFC 3261. >> >> Exactly my thought. > "unexpected-request error" seems more like a server error - or does it > point to the actual request? Not necessarily a server thing. E.g., you send me <iq type='result'/> but I never sent you <iq type='get|set'/> (where "you" and "me" are clients). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [Stox] Review of -core Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [Stox] Review of -core Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Stox] Review of -core Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [Stox] Review of -core Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Stox] Review of -core Peter Saint-Andre