IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stox] core: response code mappings

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 20 August 2013 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3CF11E82E6 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBWY7Oe3yTXp for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833FC11E8167 for <stox@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn7-904.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61828414E7; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:11:20 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5213E8BE.40003@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:07:58 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: miconda@gmail.com
References: <520EDFBB.90503@stpeter.im> <521279E3.7030309@alum.mit.edu> <52127EC5.7060907@stpeter.im> <521291A9.1030503@gmail.com> <5212970D.6070608@stpeter.im> <52132C43.3040102@gmail.com> <A35C463B-B8E7-4ECC-B300-BCDAEDC274C7@edvina.net> <52133376.5060901@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52133376.5060901@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stox@ietf.org, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Stox] core: response code mappings
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:08:10 -0000

On 8/20/13 3:14 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

> So it might be better to define new 'generic' reply codes for each class
> and let the sip endpoint handle them as stated in rfc (and pasted above).

Well, this WG is not chartered to define anything new, so I think that's
a non-starter. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email