Re: [Strint-attendees] initial cut at a recommended reading list for STRINT workshop

[Alfredo Pironti <[e-mail]>]

I like the abstract idea. I uploaded my abstract to
https://strint.pads.ccc.de/1 (too bad I had to go through 2 TLS
certificate warnings!)

We could cluster the contributions according to their pertinence area
and the agenda. On one hand, this would make it easier to find
relevant papers to read. On the other hand, I'm a bit afraid this may
implicitly encourage some sort of "segmentation".

Regards,
Alfredo

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Kai Engert <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-02-12 at 15:55 +0000, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>> It looks like there is 560 pages or papers submitted to the workshop.
>> From past experience, and given this is in the middle of submitting
>> drafts to IETF and reading a lot of IETF drafts, I would guess that
>> most people coming will not have read all of them. Does the program
>> committee have any recommendations on a set of papers that are required
>> reading? or "read these ones first"?
>
> Would it make sense to invite everyone to write a short abstract (e.g.
> two paragraphs) of their own paper?
>
> We could setup an etherpad where everyone adds their own abstract.
>
> The result would be a single long page that could be easily read
> sequentially. It could all of us to get a quick overview of the
> presented suggestions.
>
> In case you like the idea, I've prepared a pad that we could use:
> https://strint.pads.ccc.de/1
>
> Regards
> Kai
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Strint-attendees mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.i1b.org/listinfo.cgi/strint-attendees-i1b.org