Re: [Suit] Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Wed, 24 June 2020 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7D3A0CEC for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iBd3Ea9Q0T-h for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEC33A0B9F for <suit@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id k6so860408pll.9 for <suit@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yWR0S3HAnqW3A/OjdH4L5yYUzqYIMfV/pzIis7Ztf4U=; b=a3XDVkV+gBE2hefdpzOjsiEgkWYwx2oStyCbEQHKxu/2IMjTi1KGb3OUEwV4frFRRg KGsFIImATpjp6r6PvubfHrKEgrtdhVBTcPqwJDBknnXPM+6wJa7sVLgQTIR0+uTRlMpb TRxbay5LE34ekYG16166GKTlR8imkEc6UizE73GGF4Wjo4Y0N7WwEL6oPdmSNwFIPJOB VNg/bv2AFjDbhkB5pDWdfitzFdyn4YAHedByQ045NMCOu7yDktWIPMOV5s0KFAJ9H0bl CPEc28EBJRLI9Oacoy5xrpnkHJzHfCoBW8CmiM5dWiNcqrWB40qxLXyuXcG0QYO/dbDt yuAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531K1LdVrKytdpiR3XuW03nDDQ/xUrbfPBJQNeH5pl4ZpgWFnMjK R5dlwEyGWAMwvr8WNd2BUPif4iT99OjeMuVlw4kIxwCC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypotFqzJATDb95FegI8/bMUeZ69zxwaTZ1kzmgXkWwJMrUuvrKZHMkR4+Q3wfZgyzEWsuCIxC7qGUfSX2R2tU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a9c8:: with SMTP id b8mr1779708plr.48.1592992741759; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR09MB4251DE11EECD48528A867D31F0820@CH2PR09MB4251.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <AM0PR08MB3716407BC9CC85168E1B3BD8FA820@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR09MB425629F8710D3B0166F2CFFCF0940@DM6PR09MB4256.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <AM0PR08MB3716AEA3DA2D105E4E2F12ACFA940@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR09MB4256F781B9C2F575C874514FF0940@DM6PR09MB4256.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR09MB4256F781B9C2F575C874514FF0940@DM6PR09MB4256.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:58:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CANK0pbaTyGgNd2zeVpnnMB8XF7pVfTh=gN4S9GS6gTPN2-ASdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: suit <suit@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000809ee505a8d18633"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/6bdDS8jU8CH9HxEaenhCfZF-4ko>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:05 -0000

Hi Dave, all

our team (including Koen) is working on upgrading our SUIT implementation
(open sourced, in RIOT) to comply with version -07 of the manifest draft.
It seems healthy to plan on having such implementation work under our belt
by the time WGLC starts.
If all goes as planned, we should indeed be in such a position after the
hackathon and IETF108?

Cheers,

Emmanuel


On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:31 PM Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
<david.waltermire=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> That would be great. I talked with Dave and Russ today. We want to be in a
> good position to start a WG on the manifest after the IETF 108 WG meeting
> if possible. To this end, we need to work through any remaining issues.
>
> This means that any updates to the manifest draft need to be identified
> and worked as part of the hackathon.
>
> Do you think this will be possible?
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:46 PM
> To: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov>ov>; suit <
> suit@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?
>
> The authors were planning to ship another draft update in time for the
> hackathon.
> I was thinking about adding a few examples and those could be discussed
> and refined during the hackathon.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:30 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>om>; suit <suit@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?
>
> Hannes,
>
> Do you plan to provide an update with more examples before the IETF
> meeting?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 2:23 PM
> To: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov>ov>; suit <
> suit@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?
>
> Hi David,
>
> the last few draft updates have focused on improving readability. I also
> believe we need more examples and that's something I will focus on next.
> The upcoming hackathon might also help to provide further input.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 7:33 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>om>; suit <suit@ietf.org>
> Subject: Is draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07 ready for WGLC?
>
> I'd like to get a sense from the working group about how mature everyone
> thinks this draft is. Do you think there are any significant areas or work
> that still need to be addressed before starting a WGLC?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suit <suit-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:15 PM
> To: suit <suit@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Suit] draft-ietf-suit-manifest-07
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just submitted version -07 of the manifest draft.
>
> Here are the changes:
>
> * Corrected the boilerplate text (it was wrong also in the architecture
> and the information model draft)
> * All CDDL text is now concentrated in one place. This should make it
> easier to read.
> * Fixed various TBDs for parameter descriptions in the text
> * Enhanced IANA consideration section
> * Completed the Implementation Conformance Matrix
> * Removed mailing list info
>
> Here is the doc:
>
> https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-suit-manifest-07&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cdavid.waltermire%40nist.gov%7C813f72b1e9614545aedd08d8179d55b5%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C637285311809216524&amp;sdata=EGpO%2ByNDuxtenIRZbv8H6IY46H8uwdFrX0qprOGII6A%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Here is the diff:
>
> https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfcdiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-suit-manifest-07&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cdavid.waltermire%40nist.gov%7C813f72b1e9614545aedd08d8179d55b5%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C637285311809226518&amp;sdata=K5AiUbsml%2B%2Bf79FfOAj9lwUatSIK4NLmn3MnTkIMrbY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Suit mailing list
> Suit@ietf.org
>
> https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsuit&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cdavid.waltermire%40nist.gov%7C813f72b1e9614545aedd08d8179d55b5%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C637285311809226518&amp;sdata=Jl7ZQNRIyx5cpfbACkbhp77j2PbfcYwnKlr72iZQZWQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Suit mailing list
> Suit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit
>