IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] [Rats] Joint RATS SUIT virtual interim in January 2022

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 23 December 2021 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2273A0412; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0_OdsFukBeq; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB923A0433; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (cpef81d0f835a73-cmf81d0f835a70.sdns.net.rogers.com [174.115.215.42]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD081F4A6; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 2A2391A04D2; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:40:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, "suit@ietf.org" <suit@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <17C010BA-C845-4D83-8BA0-DB6AA3764C1A@intel.com>
References: <1D75549E-B556-4A0E-B9DF-AFE07CC26DE3@intel.com> <19007.1639937782@localhost> <17C010BA-C845-4D83-8BA0-DB6AA3764C1A@intel.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com> message dated "Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:42:47 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:40:51 -0500
Message-ID: <396686.1640281251@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/94UIliUXKDnNVp4laAueQl8jjps>
Subject: Re: [Suit] [Rats] Joint RATS SUIT virtual interim in January 2022
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:41:01 -0000

Smith, Ned <ned.smith@intel.com> wrote:
    > I don't think I had anything close to quorum when I sent out the
    > reminder. Since then a half dozen others contributed. Still only one
    > chair from RATS WG side. I don't know if a joint meeting requires two
    > chairs, or if they have to be from the same WG. I expect draft authors
    > should be present, but maybe not all?
    
I had assumed that you had unicast coordination with SUIT WG chairs about
this.  As Dave Thaler is one chair, I figure if you have him you are set.
It seems that we really need TEEP there as well.  I think that purpose is to
decide in which WG https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birkholz-rats-suit-claims
should be progressed.

Wrapped in here (for me) is the extent to which the EAT document is trying to
describe the protocol only (with really well worded IANA considerations), or
whether it is trying to proscribe a useful common subset of claims.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email