IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] [COSE] draft-atkins-suit-cose-walnutdsa

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 04 August 2019 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1EB120033; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 09:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ym0tiCgylzzq; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 09:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3390120025; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 09:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x74Gbe0n029413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Aug 2019 12:37:42 -0400
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 11:37:39 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, suit@ietf.org, cose <cose@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190804163739.GO1006@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <AM0PR08MB33796BC8E8E7A039525EC5C3E8150@AM0PR08MB3379.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <sjm7e90zfo5.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <835.1562080969@localhost> <sjm36imutkc.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <BFA23FAF-436A-42CC-A1D3-B02B4AC753EB@vigilsec.com> <sjmimrht021.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <20190801222835.GJ1006@kduck.mit.edu> <sjmpnlnsohy.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <sjmpnlnsohy.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/DTvVTItjelRHj-n5_RYD4zV6pK4>
Subject: Re: [Suit] [COSE] draft-atkins-suit-cose-walnutdsa
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 16:37:46 -0000

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:09:13AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> writes:
> 
> >> So I guess the question is:  Does the COSE WG want to adopt this draft?
> >
> > Note that we'd have to recharter to take it on.
> 
> Indeed.
> Considering I'm fine with an informational draft, should I approach the ISE?

That, or just go for expert review for a value greater than 65535.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email