Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a customer to verify the trust relationship between a software supplier and software signer during digital signature validation on signed code
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 10 June 2021 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD363A1B1D
for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vnplkVJaliyz for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4A53A1B1C
for <suit@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A9E300BE9
for <suit@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
with ESMTP id GnTacjknYFXA for <suit@ietf.org>;
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home
(pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBFD7300B96;
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <10E26450-1218-456E-AFD7-2D434A5A2CBB@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C4EBBE3-ACD4-402B-8592-9FCB627DB4EA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:41:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <068401d75df6$d8e0d430$8aa27c90$@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
Cc: suit <suit@ietf.org>
To: Dick Brooks <dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
References: <0f9601d75adf$5856cf50$09046df0$@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
<DBBPR08MB59155DB5DBE123F55B25894BFA359@DBBPR08MB5915.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
<068401d75df6$d8e0d430$8aa27c90$@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/E96PjSEJQCEwjXXMkZmrLpSjAH0>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a customer to
verify the trust relationship between a software supplier and software
signer during digital signature validation on signed code
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>,
<mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>,
<mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:41:18 -0000
Dick: > > Russ, I'll share my NTIA comment filing here, if you give me the green light to do so (about 6 pages in length). Can you post it on a website, and then post a pointer here? Russ
- [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a cus… Dick Brooks
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Dick Brooks
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Dick Brooks
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Dick Brooks
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Dick Brooks
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Suit] Surprising push back on the need for a… Dick Brooks