Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 12 July 2021 20:30 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A643A091C
for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tEX_LhdcoD50 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A193A0922
for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAAE300C7C
for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
with ESMTP id fJHQ_hfGRh4Y for <suit@ietf.org>;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home
(pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 726033005DF;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <5C4549E9-EF00-4C16-91EC-C95794F301A6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_C62E5342-12CA-4171-84F8-16D7C67002CB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:29:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E4B87013-1498-463F-98C0-5FF13344C3EA@arm.com>
Cc: Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com>
To: suit <suit@ietf.org>
References: <66D84CE5-22E6-44F0-8239-8A5832326219@arm.com>
<3E7D5E5B-03EE-4EDD-A951-FB119F72DDE8@arm.com> <16339.1613515194@localhost>
<E4B87013-1498-463F-98C0-5FF13344C3EA@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/Iz3p3rsxIAODn0_SYo1KOdhw_kc>
Subject: Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>,
<mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>,
<mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:30:07 -0000
Milestone thoughts to promote discussion: Oct 2021 Adoption: Mar 2022 Request Publication on standards track Russ > On Jul 12, 2021, at 3:48 PM, Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com> wrote: > > As mentioned at the virtual interim, there was already some proposed charter text circulated. Here it is again: >> To support the manifest format(s) defined by this group, it will also define formats and protocols that enable a Status Tracker to determine if a particular manifest could be successfully deployed to a device and determine if an operation was successful. >> >> Specifications of names or numbers will enable the use of manifests, their precursors, and their successors within existing or future protocols. >> > This most immediate beneficiary of this charter text is draft-moran-suit-mud. > > Given how trivial this draft is, I think it could have reasonably quick milestones, but it is, of course, dependent on draft-ietf-suit-manifest. I’d be appreciative of any suggestions on the timeline for this draft. > > Best Regards, > Brendan > >> On 16 Feb 2021, at 22:39, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>> wrote: >> >> >> Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com <mailto:Brendan.Moran@arm.com>> wrote: >> bm> As a part of proposing several new drafts, I was asked to propose some new charter text that would enable the working group to address the new drafts. >> >> bm> The drafts in question are: >> >> bm> * draft-moran-suit-mud >> bm> * draft-moran-suit-report >> bm> * draft-birkholz-rats-suit-claims (TBD, maybe SUIT, maybe RATS) >> >> As a RATS architecture editor, I prefer to do this document in SUIT. >> Sure, RATS should be consulted, but the expertise in getting the claim >> written right exists in SUIT, not RATS. >> >> bm> draft-moran-suit-mud proposes a method to anchor MUDs with the same >> bm> trust and fetch mechanisms as SUIT. >> >> bm> draft-moran-suit-report proposes a document format for reporting the >> bm> results of applying a SUIT update or secure execution using a SUIT >> bm> manifest. >> >> bm> draft-birkholz-rats-suit-claims proposes number assignments for EAT >> bm> claims that contain evidence generated during execution of a SUIT >> bm> manifest. >> >> bm> I would like to add a single paragraph to the charter: >> >>>> To support the manifest format(s) defined by this group, it will also define >>>> formats that enable precursor or successor operations around the use of >>>> the manifests. Additional specifications of names or numbers will enable >>>> the use of manifests, their precursors, and their successors within >>>> existing or future protocols. >> >> That seems like fine text. >> I am not sure that an external reviewer will understand how it implies that >> three documents are in scope. It may be just too abstract for some IESG >> members. The trend seems to be that charters are very specific. >> I think that the "precusor or successor operations" is the part that might be >> too abstract. Maybe that part should spell out what you want. >> >> } To support the manifest format(s) defined by this group, it will also >> } define formats and protocols that enable a Status Tracker to determine if a >> } particular manifest could be successfully deployed to a device, and >> } determine if an operation was successful. >> } Additional specifications of names or numbers will enable the use of >> } manifests, their precursors, and their successors within existing or future protocols. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide >> > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > Suit mailing list > Suit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit
- [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Brendan Moran
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Brendan Moran
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Brendan Moran
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Ira McDonald
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Dave Thaler
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Russ Housley
- Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text Roman Danyliw