Re: [Suit] Will the SUIT WG have a productive meeting session at IETF 114?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 07 July 2022 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D708FC15D470 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 07:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWbEuuVObyxc for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 07:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4A4C159496 for <suit@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 07:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C911A111A52; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2F0C111CD8; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <E1DF7717-9469-40AF-992A-11B91BC519A4@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_371516C6-22AA-4F5C-86B8-82807B297D9E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:25:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <767376E6-2348-45D9-85AA-9FF2A60E2C12@arm.com>
Cc: suit <suit@ietf.org>
To: Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com>
References: <34495D80-DBA4-4115-B446-C625C1BBCA33@vigilsec.com> <1F8A4C51-C3E0-4A22-9465-C939F1BA5556@arm.com> <767376E6-2348-45D9-85AA-9FF2A60E2C12@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/Qsh00_O5FXXJBRdVkrSdmNRjZ5s>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Will the SUIT WG have a productive meeting session at IETF 114?
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:25:53 -0000

Brendan:

To be fair, that discussion started while the WG Chairs were coordinating the text of the message to be sent to the lst...

Russ


> On Jul 6, 2022, at 6:35 PM, Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Correction:
> 
> Having responded to Øyvind’s recent discussion on power failures during manifest processing, maybe a small section on handling power failures in complex manifests is needed.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Brendan
> 
>> On 6 Jul 2022, at 22:10, Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com <mailto:Brendan.Moran@arm.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Russ,
>> 
>> Draft-ietf-suit-manifest-17 was published on 2022-04-08
>> Draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption was published on 2022-04-20
>> 
>> Hannes has published another example for draft-ietf-suit-firmware-encryption on the list on 12-04-2022
>> 
>> There was followup discussion about signature sizes from Koen on 2022-03-28
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Document Status:
>> 
>> I believe that there is a small, cosmetic fixup remaining for the CDDL in the suit-manifest draft, but otherwise, I’m not aware of any outstanding issues for the SUIT manifest.
>> 
>> As a chair, is there anything that is remaining to block WGLC for the suit manifest? I’m not sure what I can do to progress it other that continue working on developing more running code.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Brendan
>> 
>>> On 6 Jul 2022, at 19:42, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear SUIT WG:
>>> 
>>> The SUIT WG Chairs have seen very little activity on the mail list and none of the WG Internet-Drafts have yet been updated since IETF 113.  This silence makes us think that we may not be ready to meet at IETF 114.  Is there activity that we cannot see that will lead to a productive session?
>>> 
>>> Dave, Dave, abd Russ
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Suit mailing list
>>> Suit@ietf.org <mailto:Suit@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>
>> 
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Suit mailing list
>> Suit@ietf.org <mailto:Suit@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> Suit mailing list
> Suit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit