IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] [COSE] draft-atkins-suit-cose-walnutdsa

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC8E120020; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMeG_zxMx0sm; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69AA312000E; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4282AE2047; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18185-06; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:47:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from securerf.ihtfp.org (99-46-190-172.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net [99.46.190.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mocana.ihtfp.org", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC9FE2045; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:47:28 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1564670848; bh=iqB+tvWkFZ3foDNrwnAv6qNxMxpkIA56SKORWJ/X7OA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=NvKOy8xDoSSdXGsDqg/tU15kTXbHx3RFHyYErQDyvdTsuJ85NfuOsVKxiZQLzTYQA FXuSjncOyezNWr+71MMvw+sIvlVGja2vQ8egch/nsr+eh+RlJRLpM4hxIvxFX6cdm/ NJ+P5+k3iHzw8zyO3eFiTV5llCemyY0IddzY5MF4=
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by securerf.ihtfp.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x71ElK3a029064; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:47:20 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>, suit@ietf.org
References: <AM0PR08MB33796BC8E8E7A039525EC5C3E8150@AM0PR08MB3379.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <sjm7e90zfo5.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <835.1562080969@localhost> <sjm36imutkc.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <BFA23FAF-436A-42CC-A1D3-B02B4AC753EB@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:47:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BFA23FAF-436A-42CC-A1D3-B02B4AC753EB@vigilsec.com> (Russ Housley's message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:29:52 -0400")
Message-ID: <sjmimrht021.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/VUWLo3LK6ymWp8VdAoY8lkHoLfc>
Subject: Re: [Suit] [COSE] draft-atkins-suit-cose-walnutdsa
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:47:35 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> writes:

> Derek:
>
>>> That's what I would do: just ask for the values via Expert Review, and live
>>> for now, with the a five-byte (encoded) COSE Algorithm code, if your market
>>> need is urgent.
>> 
>> Yes, I could just request the entries in the registry.  However, I am
>> trying to be a good netizen; I want to have a document that people can
>> look at to understand what the registry items mean.
>
> I think that a document that includes the code point is the best outcome here.

So I guess the question is:  Does the COSE WG want to adopt this draft?
Or should I submit to ISE?

Thanks,

> Russ

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email