IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] NIST selected PQM algorithms

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 11 July 2022 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E4FC188726 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jd_JK4JIlrcE for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE01AC188724 for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D61B39F80; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:44:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DBPlVpTV6rNs; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171EE39F7E; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1657575893; bh=2hCXwuuuyT69dDrYdoNnFjRBy0hhUx1GkwkMSwWog80=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=np+jCmITwivXouxCcwyAE3HYRFnAu4aIhqN8/iQ25ATB6D0/4MLt/78sFIkxlsx5n plKpoxYHLOH8s+w8gOIrRLg9ZUtci8gyBB9j0r9qtdH+LOmM9hQyVR12jXFgqJ1x3F KJRpoWJdYDYrEy19x0hMIN0O+6fgg6AbeVWxLTPm//9Vjbj5jcVCAfYRg5ql0E7JGn jhcIlStunhB1ezEXU0RH/MpUr+WMVC9zG1YVcnsAk5bEimdHm+P6+aKLmwHJTPhkEC nf2m+5aFVpOih4XLkzY2RQX5FWojz4jVLUly9liAxI1zVbcgzimhF3Rv++z3sJTzqS 4Nk5NimHKonmg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954FC373; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com>, Koen Zandberg <koen.zandberg@inria.fr>, "suit@ietf.org" <suit@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <219AA8B1-AEBB-49CC-BF1A-2FA670FFC5C5@vigilsec.com>
References: <5ccdaef9-1e28-9d4e-8ab5-28179454b09f@inria.fr> <9EBE36DB-4E12-4849-ABA1-538330A778B2@vigilsec.com> <35BEE00D-AA5A-40CC-BBF1-867DDE21D597@arm.com> <219AA8B1-AEBB-49CC-BF1A-2FA670FFC5C5@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:27:30 -0400
Message-ID: <27982.1657574850@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/ZJAXnfPvdh88LSmrI4nHpClEp3I>
Subject: Re: [Suit] NIST selected PQM algorithms
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:27:37 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > I am not opposed to any of the NIST Round 3 Signature winners, but I
    > gather it will be another year before there will be NIST standards.

So, let me ask the question again, since I did not get a clear answer.

I understand that there might be significant implementation guidance and
changes to the text.  But PHB's answer didn't help decide what the *schedule*
impact of us putting Falcon in instead of HSS-LSS.

It's okay if we say Falcon, and it takes a year, but it also takes us a year
to get the documents through the WGLC and IESG.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email