Re: [Suit] Call for adoption on manifest draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 17 June 2019 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F661120293 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwAKlTrr8ipy for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60662120282 for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.133]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85911F47D for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:47:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id ADD2B3810; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "suit\@ietf.org" <suit@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <SN6PR09MB32643D17285ACEEED3D23FC4F0EB0@SN6PR09MB3264.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SN6PR09MB32643D17285ACEEED3D23FC4F0EB0@SN6PR09MB3264.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov> message dated "Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:53:43 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:47:26 -0400
Message-ID: <12354.1560790046@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/cLE0qHO_udgDNzGscqV0sThufj0>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Call for adoption on manifest draft
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:47:28 -0000

Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:
    > At IETF 104, we had some good discussion on the manifest format and
    > discussed moving it forward with a call for adoption after the meeting.

    > Based on the discussion so far, the chairs would like to start a call
    > for adoption on draft-moran-suit-manifest.  Specifically, the chairs
    > want to hear from the WG if this draft is a good starting point for a
    > WG manifest format?

    > The latest version of draft-moran-suit-manifest can be found here:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moran-suit-manifest/

    > If you believe that this document is not an acceptable starting point,
    > please state the rationale.

I am happy with this document.
The SUIT_Manifest is a map rather than an array, and that was my major beef
with previous versions.

(I had to go look at the document to be sure I knew which document was which,
as I feel very uncomfortable with the proceedural stuff in draft-moran-suit-behavioural-manifest.
But, that's not the document you are asking about)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-