IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-suit-manifest-21

Koen Zandberg <koen.zandberg@inria.fr> Mon, 28 November 2022 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <koen.zandberg@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C48C14F738 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:13:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=inria.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REO7_fGXm0C2 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BE86C14CEEC for <suit@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:12:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:cc: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpPoH3ucU/zI0a9GLHmLM8ihWKce+MKU7CaQ/r1NqrM=; b=agQflbdWBr6lZhR3SbVPt2lUXZRy7PFKpIQagDxvd6jTcpNShIZrHawS bVsaZFA8T0iHFx11ue8QF8UVQupqF3wowMpxoyYBIPNmIk5az3whMnbWM DMwPjSsPqxXfWaeYxmeZ4KxBIZ+lsx6YVMr5gS2hO/1cTLPxZavqNrhfZ Y=;
Authentication-Results: mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=koen.zandberg@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,200,1665439200"; d="scan'208";a="41087752"
Received: from 185-227-75-229.dsl.cambrium.nl (HELO [10.1.2.75]) ([185.227.75.229]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Nov 2022 13:12:56 +0100
Message-ID: <62bea83b-beb9-aa0c-0195-242a78f62066@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:12:54 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: suit@ietf.org
References: <166800707576.11788.10779701241919063730@ietfa.amsl.com> <8BC58D62-0DF3-4670-B857-D5E4145E7295@vigilsec.com> <CAPmVn1Mq8HF73eMG_5sAjRXFgOs+zOuNRmrRTLY2w-R8JF+aMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: brendan.moran.ietf@gmail.com
From: Koen Zandberg <koen.zandberg@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CAPmVn1Mq8HF73eMG_5sAjRXFgOs+zOuNRmrRTLY2w-R8JF+aMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/hTuDMVonqgWwCrPWOV-U78-inxE>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-suit-manifest-21
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:13:02 -0000

Hi,

I support publication of this document in its current form.

Cheers,
Koen

On 24/11/2022 15:23, Brendan Moran wrote:
> I didn't explicitly voice my support; as an author, I took it as
> implied. However, I haven't seen any additional traffic on this call,
> so:
>
> I support this document in its current form.
>
> Best Regards,
> Brendan
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 3:28 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> Based on the discussion during the session at IETF 115, it appears that the last of the open issues have been resolved.
>>
>> Name: draft-ietf-suit-manifest
>> Revision: 21
>> Title: A Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)-based Serialization Format for the Software Updates for Internet of Things (SUIT) Manifest
>> Document date: 2022-11-09
>> Group: suit
>> Pages: 94
>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-suit-manifest-21.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-suit-manifest/
>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-suit-manifest
>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-suit-manifest-21
>>
>>
>> Please reply to this message by Wednesday, 20 November 2022 to voice your support or disagreement that this document is ready to go to the IESG for publication.
>>
>> On behalf of the SUIT WG Chairs,
>>    Russ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Suit mailing list
>> Suit@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit
> _______________________________________________
> Suit mailing list
> Suit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email