IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 31 October 2021 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C23A0A94 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTwx0mFCulrV for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874D53A0A8E for <suit@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 15:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A741820C; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:11:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qLBAhLczIx-q; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CD61803B; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF723130; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, suit <suit@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8A3FC35F-E993-4899-9213-A2DCA8D1F857@vigilsec.com>
References: <66D84CE5-22E6-44F0-8239-8A5832326219@arm.com> <3E7D5E5B-03EE-4EDD-A951-FB119F72DDE8@arm.com> <16339.1613515194@localhost> <E4B87013-1498-463F-98C0-5FF13344C3EA@arm.com> <6FC3F38A-B067-4180-ACD9-A121162EA459@vigilsec.com> <26718.1626138395@localhost> <MN2PR09MB4841BA0A0CC978E70A09A509F0119@MN2PR09MB4841.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <67F117E7-28F2-45F3-BC4C-AC8116BCB69F@vigilsec.com> <SN6PR2101MB0943178F1E627E78A1343AE8A3E59@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <50B65F80-808D-4591-9D4D-2346796DA204@vigilsec.com> <1944E3C3-9348-4574-AE26-4133BFD932B0@vigilsec.com> <CH2PR21MB1464AC4D50A932EC45A3B369A3EF9@CH2PR21MB1464.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <3944F4E6-9644-4D23-9DB0-B0AC0490AB51@vigilsec.com> <A460F3FC-0EC6-4B8F-9D8C-D40AC841E602@arm.com> <20192.1628612087@localhost> <CAN40gSsvPrnMzUrQASo7nmJJKYGjNm=GNtOd9v9+a7Ni1waCCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR21MB1464E5F803ED4E22B6D90DD3A3F79@CH2PR21MB1464.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <2002841D-85D6-41AB-B214-963174485119@vigilsec.com> <8 A3FC35F-E993-4899-9213-A2DCA8D1F857@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:09:47 -0400
Message-ID: <14164.1635718187@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/uPIvLBA1Ol-VDrU7_sAg4elxyRg>
Subject: Re: [Suit] SUIT rechartering: proposed text
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:09:58 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    > I have not seen any new comments since August.  I would like to send
    > this to the IESG.  Any last minute concerns?

I remember that, I remember asking for past-tense on completed items.
I see that in the text.  I am happy with the changes.


> * A secure method for an IoT device to report on firmware update status.

I'm unclear if we have proposals for this at this point.

I also thought that transports for firmware updates would be in scope after the
core work was done.

There is really good work done by Cenk Gündoğan,Christian Amsüss,Thomas
C. Schmidt, and Matthias Wählisch.  https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09555.pdf
It was presented at the CORE virtual interim two weeks ago.
(I think. Maybe I'm confused.)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email