IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Wed, 16 May 2018 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119571241F5 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 20:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJAyUMhiwj_Q for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 20:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A416120724 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 20:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Tue, 15 May 2018 20:41:15 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Tue, 15 May 2018 20:41:15 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
CC: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4
Thread-Index: AQHT7AhcBqCZz9NOpUKFtvxnWAONl6QwuKSAgAF0HYA=
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 03:41:14 +0000
Message-ID: <EC39B83C-CAE1-4C50-AED8-1D8EC0002422@icann.org>
References: <756C7AEB-B6B1-4034-BFFF-AC02D2DE452C@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1805150724290.17103@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1805150724290.17103@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.26.0.170902
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7942543995546146A9160329D8BE386C@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/23hUlaSZF0KgKzMzXgBd7DWzWS4>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 03:41:21 -0000

Hi Mikael,

That is a fair request.

I’m not sure the MIF example applies completely as the situations were different, however I’ll take on board the desire for AD guidance when it comes to work.

I appreciate the desire to have a ‘home’ for discussions. How about this. I’ll close the WG, but leave the sunset4 mailing list open at least until March next year. I’m sure that the volume of discussion up to then will help us evaluate the utility of keeping this list alive. I will naturally stay on the list and watch for any “where does this work go” type messages and guide where I can.

Cheers
Terry

On 15/05/2018, 15:29, "sunset4 on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson" <sunset4-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

    On Tue, 15 May 2018, Terry Manderson wrote:
    
    > different charter specifically for that item. It has also been made 
    > quite clear with the discussions surrounding the last Sunset4 WG item 
    > that the IETF and the internet industry are simply not ready to change 
    > the status of IPv4 while, in reality, the move to IPv6 (only) will be a 
    > very long-tailed exercise.
    
    When MIF was closed, work was directed to another working group.
    
    I'd like to see similar guidance for the closing of this WG. There is 
    still work to be done, for instance the discussions in v6ops/6man on an 
    "no-v4-here"-flag is quite obvious fit there, but other 
    discussions/guidance on how to behave when there seems to be no IPv4 
    around, where should this take place? For instance discussions on backoff 
    timers for DHCPv4 / DNSSD v4 usage in the abscence of no automatic v4 seen 
    when connecting?
    
    I can understand that the discussions we've had are not enough to warrant 
    a WG, but it doesn't mean there are no discussions at all. It would be 
    good if they had a home.
    
    -- 
    Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
    
    _______________________________________________
    sunset4 mailing list
    sunset4@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email