User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.c.0.180410
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:08:34 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <87EBB068-FAFB-484E-B7FB-F9056DEE45C4@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/lHXAXsgcVcvfoZjhk5temuMPxa4>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4
Precedence: list

I disagree with this decision.

Just look into any other WG. Compare the number of people in the mailing li=
st and the number of contributions.

This is a general issue in IETF, most of the people in the list is not real=
ly contributing at all.

I think sunset4 is needed, and it may happen that the pace of the work, is =
a bit slower than in other WGs, but we should keep the WG alive.

It is possible to at least keep the mailing list working?

Regards,
Jordi
=20
=20
=EF=BB=BF-----Mensaje original-----
De: sunset4 <sunset4-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Terry Manderson <terry.=
manderson@icann.org>
Fecha: martes, 15 de mayo de 2018, 6:51
Para: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Asunto: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4

    Dear WG,
   =20
    I feel the time has come to close Sunset4. As you all must realise IETF=
 Working Groups are there to do work, and in discussion with the co-chairs =
it appears that the list of potential work for Sunset4 has dried up. It may=
 be that some activity on a similar topic is needed in the future, however =
I feel that a future body of work should have a different charter specifica=
lly for that item. It has also been made quite clear with the discussions s=
urrounding the last Sunset4 WG item that the IETF and the internet industry=
 are simply not ready to change the status of IPv4 while, in reality, the m=
ove to IPv6 (only) will be a very long-tailed exercise.=20
   =20
    I=E2=80=99d like to thank all WG member=E2=80=99s contributions over th=
e life of this WG. Some of the discussions have been both exciting and insi=
ghtful.=20
   =20
    As AD, I would especially like to thank Marc Blanchet and Wes George fo=
r co-chairing Sunset4 with professionalism and enthusiasm. Thanks Marc and =
Wes!!
   =20
    The WG will be officially closed later this week, along with the mailin=
g list.
   =20
    Thank you all!
   =20
    Cheers
    Terry (responsible AD for Sunset4)
    _______________________________________________
    sunset4 mailing list
    sunset4@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
   =20



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or con=
fidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the i=
ndividual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, =
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if p=
artially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be cons=
idered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware t=
hat any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this in=
formation, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibi=
ted, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the origin=
al sender to inform about this communication and delete it.