Re: [Supa] review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02

"Liushucheng (Will Liu)" <liushucheng@huawei.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <liushucheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496AB131CCC for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcekH-PlJrsz for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6AE131CBE for <supa@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DRK35377; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:40:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:40:16 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.91]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 05:40:09 +0800
From: "Liushucheng (Will Liu)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
To: Yangyang Wang <wyystar@gmail.com>, "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>
CC: Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Thread-Topic: review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02
Thread-Index: AQHS+Jn44FjGj2gvHk29le5AJ48JE6JYhIDg
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:40:09 +0000
Message-ID: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB8A34CEA1@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAJ4hSFPkss-KBCK5TpmofbdpZoq1sWBE1XnMngfHJV-Gm+Gq7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4hSFPkss-KBCK5TpmofbdpZoq1sWBE1XnMngfHJV-Gm+Gq7g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.210.172.137]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB8A34CEA1dggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.596D2EC2.006F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.91, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: bb55e05d6c02c9fda306123f009ff697
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/8HDNYPfAt-EZ_z-JCt6tjItznIM>
Subject: Re: [Supa] review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:40:23 -0000

Hi Yangyang,

Many thanks for your comments. Some responses below inline.


From: Yangyang Wang [mailto:wyystar@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2017 11:59 AM
To: supa@ietf.org
Cc: Liushucheng (Will Liu) <liushucheng@huawei.com>; Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02

I have reviewed  draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework. My comments are as follows:

1) This draft contains many concepts that are very abstract. I suggest this draft may briefly describe the contents and the goal  of this draft and its significance. Some simple and concrete instances can be added in the descriptions of the management framework to help clarify the abstract concepts and framework in this draft.
[Will] The goal of this draft is describing the SUPA basic framework, its elements and interfaces. I guess you wanted to ask about the goal of SUPA? The SUPA working group defines a data model, to be used to represent high-level, possibly network-wide policies, which can be input to a network management function (within a controller, an orchestrator, or a network element). Processing that input most probably results in network configuration changes.
Some simple instances will be added and also refer to the applicability draft [I-D.cheng-supa-applicability].

2) "Traffic flow over increasingly complex enterprise and service provider network becomes more and more important" may be change to "The management of Traffic flow over increasingly complex enterprise and service provider network becomes more and more important ?
[Will] No exactly.  Here we mean firstly the traffic is more and more important, second the variety makes deploying new service more difficult, leading to the mechanisms of policy-based management which deals with above issues.

3) "OSS:Operations/Operational Support System, are computer systems" should be "OSS: Operations/Operational Support Systems, are computer systems".

4) "Imperative policy rules require additional management functions, which are explained in section 2.2 below" may be  "Imperative policy rules require additional management functions, which are explained in section 3.2 below"

5) "(1:1..n) in (1) and (2) below figure 3 shows one policy rule is able to manages and can adjust one or multiple services/resources." may be "(1:1..n) in (1) and (2) below figure 3 show one policy rule is able to manage and adjust one or multiple services/resources." ?

6) "The Operator actor shown can interact with SUPA in other ways not shown in Figure 1" may be "The Operator actor, shown in figure 1, can interact with SUPA in other ways not shown in Figure 1"
[Will] All the above are fixed.

Regards,
Will