Re: [SWMP] Kicking things off

Braden McDaniel <braden@endoframe.com> Tue, 29 May 2007 19:44 UTC

Return-path: <swmp-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7cV-0008Dn-UR; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:44:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7cU-0008Dh-9N for swmp@ietf.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:44:38 -0400
Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=friskymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7cT-00065e-0o for swmp@ietf.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:44:38 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.21] (ip70-179-64-52.dc.dc.cox.net [70.179.64.52]) by friskymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37055F56D; Tue, 29 May 2007 12:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [SWMP] Kicking things off
From: Braden McDaniel <braden@endoframe.com>
To: giles@yumetech.com
In-Reply-To: <465C6CA2.2000702@yumetech.com>
References: <46604A7B.30308@mediamachines.com> <465C5993.5040805@yumetech.com> <1180458854.3584.16.camel@hinge.endoframe.net> <465C60D7.3020202@yumetech.com> <1180461340.3584.33.camel@hinge.endoframe.net> <465C6CA2.2000702@yumetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:44:35 -0400
Message-Id: <1180467875.3584.41.camel@hinge.endoframe.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Cc: swmp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: swmp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of a Simple Wide-area Multiuser-3D Protocol <swmp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/swmp>, <mailto:swmp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/swmp>
List-Post: <mailto:swmp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:swmp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/swmp>, <mailto:swmp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: swmp-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:10 -0700, Alan Hudson wrote:

> No problem.  I've just be wrestling with where to go past HLA.  Jay 
> brought up HLA as a possible solution to this space.  I thought TENA was 
> following the same path so I blasted both with the same barrel.  Sounds 
> like TENA is not trying to solve the same standardization problem.

At the protocol level, neither HLA nor TENA will be much help. Both of
these solutions include concepts that one can learn from when designing
a shared simulation. But I hope SWMP's goals are much more conservative
than specifying the scope of communications for objects in a shared
simulation.

-- 
Braden McDaniel                           e-mail: <braden@endoframe.com>
<http://endoframe.com>                    Jabber: <braden@jabber.org>



_______________________________________________
SWMP mailing list
SWMP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/swmp