RE: [Syslog] delineated datagrams

On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 05:29 +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Bazsi, all,
> 
> I am not really able to follow the thread, but let me put in an
> important thought.
> 
> We *must* allow LF inside the message. If we do not do that, it would
> cause problems with -protocol. This issue has been discussed at length,
> and there are good reasons for allowing it. So while I vote to use LF
> for record delineation, I also say that this means LF MUST be escaped if
> present in the actual message (transfer encoding). After being decoded,
> LF may be present in MSG.
> 
> Maybe this already has been said ;)

This makes sense. What about other control characters?

-- 
Bazsi

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog