Re: [Syslog] timeline

"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Wed, 16 August 2006 17:56 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GDPcq-0002W3-Ms; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:56:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GDPcp-0002Vy-5H for syslog@ietf.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:56:19 -0400
Received: from astro.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.163.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GDPcn-0006lb-T2 for syslog@ietf.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:56:19 -0400
Received: from pc6 (1Cust18.tnt16.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [62.188.145.18]) by astro.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CFEF8E000070; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:56:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <004101c6c154$2a1a0600$0601a8c0@pc6>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, syslog@ietf.org
References: <082101c6bca3$165a36e0$0400a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Syslog] timeline
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:51:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc:
X-BeenThere: syslog@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: syslog-bounces@lists.ietf.org

From: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: <syslog@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: [Syslog] timeline
>
> Here are two things we need to resolve soon.
>
<snip>
> 2) whether draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib represents WG consensus on
> what needs to be managed in the protocol, udp, tls, and sign
> documents, and if not, what needs to be changed to represent WG
> consensus. We want to finalize this WG decision by August 18 as well.

I still have trouble with the mib document, not for any mibby reason but simply
because, as I commented on the previous version, it seems to be written in a
different language to the other I-D and, insofar as I understand that language,
seems to be describing a different set of concepts to the other documents.  As I
said, this is a question of reading the introductory text, no network management
skills required, to see, if like me, you think this out of line with the other
I-D.

TOm Petch


>
> David Harrington
> dharrington@huawei.com
> dbharrington@comcast.net
> ietfdbh@comcast.net
> co-chair, Syslog WG
>


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog