Re: [Syslog] Issue 3 - Text revision from GENART review
"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 15 June 2010 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629D528C125 for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.272, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dy0SvcNVg08Z for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c2beaomr03.btconnect.com (c2beaomr03.btconnect.com [213.123.26.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14628C119 for <syslog@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc6 (host81-153-11-165.range81-153.btcentralplus.com [81.153.11.165]) by c2beaomr03.btconnect.com with SMTP id MBT80231; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:22:51 +0100 (BST)
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Neutral-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0301.4C176287.0084, actions=tag
Message-ID: <006c01cb0c74$3a4dada0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>, syslog@ietf.org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006070745170.27400@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:56:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr03.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0207.4C176291.03B1, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Issue 3 - Text revision from GENART review
X-BeenThere: syslog@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:22:55 -0000
looks good to me Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <clonvick@cisco.com> To: <syslog@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:18 PM Subject: [Syslog] Issue 3 - Text revision from GENART review > Issue 3 - Text revision from GENART review > > From Miguel Garcia (GENART review) > - In Section 5.3, the last sentence of the first paragraph reads: > > "When the DTLS handshake has > finished, the transport sender MAY then send the first syslog > message." > > I think what you really want to say is: > > "The transport sender MUST NOT send any syslog message before the > DTLS handshake has successfully completed." > > Proposal supported by Russ Housley > > ACTION: No opposition to this seen. Authors to incorporate. > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > Syslog@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog