Re: [Syslog] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5424 (5010)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Fri, 05 May 2017 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: syslog@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: syslog@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF45B1294C8 for <syslog@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2017 09:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id StAK1p6iZUYw for <syslog@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2017 09:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94965124234 for <syslog@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 May 2017 09:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n198so4050506wmg.0 for <syslog@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 May 2017 09:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XeF8Em71R8/bfeQW7M57tb+ADgoIF9w43327PISCvmk=; b=VjcQzXtI4Ug/jC06HQRLQU/f0OreOcR0ePUl/sGc5CmytFNVP5NLEKEuEYM4fxQIsH 9KRISlA9Vl4ZS5K/+gGBZxnfzbwVvvv3pi3PLy6a0xGRDi4KCC/3JuTp3C3KnSRetRxZ 5ezc/+QmHH6ECQCM166CA0gCjaDuryAwX1oTVkqyTlQRwvy6GKu4+Yq5ZNkwBVejztLB dMCuV1xbNz7oNJROq5+B5rcVe87vwXdpBz4q68ohbVQCXs/Z+VRtt1WL+fMccHQAX+Mo z98h8zaes9JFF2ORWxEQoJRmcOwStvA1mCK4jBjaYBsvumMe+6Q0wipFH044/0IJFOHr SW1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6CCyD8YsjBQNywxYWJpkJZRUbRbqzvK2/M08LfAMEBzWCpsPmV HKVzgv1el7vTMQ==
X-Received: by 10.80.173.72 with SMTP id z8mr6550664edc.111.1494003436906; Fri, 05 May 2017 09:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:597:4a36:bb29:1e61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x27sm1423070edb.49.2017.05.05.09.57.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 May 2017 09:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 18:57:15 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Cc: rgerhards@adiscon.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net, clonvick@cisco.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, syslog@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170505165715.flv24uei5crmbz4k@Vurt.local>
References: <20170505101240.D3BBBB820DE@rfc-editor.org> <014f01d2c5bf$446d39c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <014f01d2c5bf$446d39c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/syslog/g6Af-2W1F0GcRjBD3IeOeM0dkLg>
Subject: Re: [Syslog] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5424 (5010)
X-BeenThere: syslog@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/syslog/>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 16:57:20 -0000

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 05:46:27PM +0100, t.petch wrote:
> If this is a Technical Erratum, as it claims, then it is time to get
> out the abacus!

I'm unsure what the purpose of your comment is. I just followed
directions to the best of my ability.

Please review https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-report/ it states:

    "Technical – error in the technical content (Note that changes in
    the usage of RFC 2119 keywords are considered technical.)"

Kind regards,

Job