Re: [T2TRG] Splot/SMCP vs LwM2M

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> Tue, 26 February 2019 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
X-Original-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014F3130EC0 for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 02:32:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ELnMFX4kOKd for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 02:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr140077.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.14.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F21130EC2 for <T2TRG@irtf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 02:32:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arm-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ktg/cyGap8WxqRaSMm0GxLSD6TFhM+rv64df4CzNaXA=; b=W1Axz7GyAp4zW2CTNWudKszXUF8GDuPV7B9DkZEWewjnGY+zDkLtj1pe8akvR5lidl8G3MUUEj5dcfXUL8x+gpN8igoprzbPDhwRjDjylq4ND5lDVQWDC8zDH4MfM9a+ElR8KVZuFkZtxjVm2Ia+rCyUP+y0ZbjiqpWfx8Dkhvc=
Received: from VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.173.75.16) by VI1PR0801MB1918.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.173.73.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1643.16; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:32:50 +0000
Received: from VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3ce6:d8fa:3271:6019]) by VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3ce6:d8fa:3271:6019%8]) with mapi id 15.20.1643.019; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:32:50 +0000
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
To: Robert Quattlebaum <rquattle=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "T2TRG@irtf.org" <T2TRG@irtf.org>
CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Thread-Topic: [T2TRG] Splot/SMCP vs LwM2M
Thread-Index: AQHUyu/oIpmfdICUoUWWByk29XPPm6Xx5uCQ
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:32:50 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR0801MB2112B428AF238E831242042FFA7B0@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BBCA0B43-1D8F-460E-B0C3-77C1FCEC04DA@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBCA0B43-1D8F-460E-B0C3-77C1FCEC04DA@google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com;
x-originating-ip: [80.92.118.223]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 16de01d8-0884-413c-3ead-08d69bd5c1d0
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:VI1PR0801MB1918;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR0801MB1918:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR0801MB1918; 20:gi2yHobsIkLYuqY+6hsSl53sNDXkxnmf514OQG3y+SNZ/zXY8bQDaKgcV/pL9dLlJRODhKRXCysJm3rPqI3VfBpImNqJ0X9OqP4Jc7zZS/pVf+hAi5pSD55/ivkXhimoWSZ9de5Kc4S0yWmZV0WUA0SnLVcP53MpoM+LLB5jrQo=
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR0801MB19182A41F13E5C0976626259FA7B0@VI1PR0801MB1918.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 096029FF66
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(40434004)(199004)(189003)(53754006)(81166006)(106356001)(33656002)(81156014)(102836004)(6116002)(53546011)(6506007)(26005)(790700001)(7736002)(97736004)(99286004)(76176011)(8676002)(7696005)(478600001)(68736007)(3846002)(2906002)(606006)(9326002)(105586002)(72206003)(110136005)(316002)(25786009)(8936002)(66066001)(9686003)(54896002)(86362001)(486006)(6306002)(6436002)(55016002)(236005)(2501003)(5660300002)(4326008)(476003)(966005)(14454004)(53936002)(5024004)(14444005)(256004)(6246003)(186003)(229853002)(52536013)(71190400001)(11346002)(71200400001)(446003)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR0801MB1918; H:VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: arm.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ciN0xfH51vXFGXcSpxvdbyTQcGKOxm44hKx3gmZLlm2eE4/Yo1FTY/jAH4z1H5jydlAlmPBfVdWOIHyTJsITM0MrlDgdnyj3qbm0Z9dyFqEBsEl6bckziF0fYF6gJAvfXZQN4W4jElOlvr0iBbePq8JYCYIWW0SGdfjqfaVo95aMRg5QkOw0ke7ajSP6SanM5uywRzfM1DyuZjFw3XDu3HB/1wQytKQf1DzrLC9QBAL7IffX8FI7kIZyHty0EAMm7KEqfSoG0h5Q7Wqmk1J+C0dPESqGAGiRD1LIlKXaXbU5QCCyUUkVc7NwLb+iNJ08nnxC7tjjGY+cjOlAQlv1kP53XOFqtA9ySmFRpOnRxEG6ty5z/HBALAXAw899f6N9AEVzr7UKsmXGXXX3Jf8gWDV49IU98AQYRL9aiyh6h4w=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1PR0801MB2112B428AF238E831242042FFA7B0VI1PR0801MB2112_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 16de01d8-0884-413c-3ead-08d69bd5c1d0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2019 10:32:50.0402 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR0801MB1918
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/t2trg/k4RvBTg14-J5uiM7cAsFo5xNEfg>
Subject: Re: [T2TRG] Splot/SMCP vs LwM2M
X-BeenThere: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Thing-to-Thing Research Group <t2trg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg/>
List-Post: <mailto:t2trg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:32:57 -0000

Hi Robert,

What are you actually comparing here? Are you interested in comparing the data models, the underlying protocols, the security mechanisms, deployment status, support for specific use cases, .... ?
What version of LwM2M are you looking at?

Ciao
Hannes


From: T2TRG <t2trg-bounces@irtf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Quattlebaum
Sent: Freitag, 22. Februar 2019 21:48
To: T2TRG@irtf.org
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Subject: [T2TRG] Splot/SMCP vs LwM2M

Hello everyone,

Sorry it's so late, but here is the document I put together outlining some of the differences between LwM2M and Splot/SMCP:

                https://github.com/google/splot-java/wiki/SMCP-vs-LwM2M

I'd love to hear feedback, especially those more familiar with LwM2M so that I can make sure I am characterizing LwM2M correctly.

-- RQ

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.