IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [T2TRG] Azure Digital Twin Definition Language

"wjgo_10009@btinternet.com" <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
X-Original-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0FA3A0B9D for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btinternet.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9WzJPCBR1Vz for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CA53A0B8F for <t2trg@irtf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-OWM-Source-IP: 10.110.13.1 ()
X-OWM-Env-Sender: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean
X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddufedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepvffkjghfufggtggfihfhffesrgdtregstderjeenucfhrhhomhepfdifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmfdcuoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefleeifeehleejkeehueehuefhjeefjeehheegvddtvdehhfdtteejveegfefhfeenucffohhmrghinhepghhlohgsrghlnhgvthdrtghordhukhdpshhnohhmvggurdhorhhgpdguihhgihhtrghlrdhnhhhsrdhukhdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppedutddruddutddrudefrddupdekiedrudefhedrudduledrudeljeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopeifvggsmhgrihhlfeelrdgsthdrvgigthdrtghptghlohhuugdrtghordhukhdpihhnvghtpedutddruddutddrudefrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeojhhmsggvrhhisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeothdvthhrghesihhrthhfrdhorhhgqedprhgtphht thhopeeofihjghhopgdutddttdelsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheq
Received: from webmail39.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (10.110.13.1) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as wjgo_10009@btinternet.com) id 5CFA38CA0AFB2D11; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:18:31 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1590167914; bh=r0MRIuBpKJiCoHNZ45ViimwWlh2hF/8vEBGmGxt2Z68=; h=To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:From:Date; b=aCidu11NpcHt4DI85vF4VkeXIsKq/iiSbKG9+XJdWzKQ70cQF7XegJOYgww4hCwNQu4akgOBzxxgsqoahg9/iXWCVD180LR6x2ReTV5lRVt7Fhl67EnBqoe2VPcAiZ4/eGSqOQ/R5QlCmc1lpxm2cfppyQqo4NgiEVSH9+LF9JU=
Received: from [86.135.119.197] by ux.btmail.bt.com with HTTP; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:18:32 +0100
To: Jonathan Beri <jmberi@gmail.com>, t2trg@irtf.org
Cc: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
Message-ID: <4a94b3ad.8bc.1723d64bee9.Webtop.226@btinternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANcmUPF275+y0S0JW-ic3U=7Vt8UFmByBVfi4JVw5w69bXM76A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANcmUPF275+y0S0JW-ic3U=7Vt8UFmByBVfi4JVw5w69bXM76A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17745_742305048.1590167912069"
User-Agent: OWM Mail 3
X-SID: 226
X-Originating-IP: [86.135.119.197]
From: "wjgo_10009@btinternet.com" <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 18:18:32 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/t2trg/tgbvfKHC5Px--0JOxRGiuegP8Hs>
Subject: Re: [T2TRG] Azure Digital Twin Definition Language
X-BeenThere: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Thing-to-Thing Research Group <t2trg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg/>
List-Post: <mailto:t2trg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 17:18:39 -0000

Would It be good to have available a list of pre-prepared strings for 
use with a language-independent version of each encoded as a numerical 
value?

This use of numerical codes is used in my own research project (which is 
mostly not about the Internet of Things)

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/localizable_sentences_research.htm

and the SNOMED CT system for clinical terminology.

https://www.snomed.org/

https://digital.nhs.uk/services/terminology-and-classifications/snomed-ct

This would not stop any other strings being used in Azure, but could 
help in some circumstances.

So, considering

https://github.com/Azure/IoTPlugandPlay/tree/master/DTDL#display-string-localization

could one have, for example, just with an example from what I have 
encoded at the moment, as an illustration of the format

  "displayName": {

         "en": "Good day.",

         "fr": "Bonjour.",

         "x-y":"!123"

          }

This could be helpful as use of such standardized codes could facilitate 
precise external localization lookup for languages not mentioned in any 
particular program that is written in Azure.

William Overington

Friday 22 May 2020


------ Original Message ------
From: "Jonathan Beri" <jmberi@gmail.com>
To: t2trg@irtf.org
Sent: Thursday, 2020 May 21 At 23:05
Subject: [T2TRG] Azure Digital Twin Definition Language

https://github.com/Azure/IoTPlugandPlay/tree/master/DTDL 
<https://github.com/Azure/IoTPlugandPlay/tree/master/DTDL>

This week Microsoft had their developer event Build and one of the 
topics was enhancements to their Digital Twins service 
<https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/digital-twins/> . During a 
presentation I learned that they've developed a JSON-LD description 
language DTDL <https://github.com/Azure/IoTPlugandPlay> .. Has anyone 
evaluated it to see how it fits into this groups efforts? I recall 
seeing a spreadsheet from Michael K. that compared different 
descriptions languages but I don't recall if DTDL is included.

-- 

Jonathan Beri
linkedin.com/in/jonathanberi <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathanberi/>


  _______________________________________________
T2TRG mailing list
T2TRG@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg 
<https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email