IETF Logo Mail Archive

[T2TRG] new Version Notification for draft-richardson-t2trg-idevid-considerations-06.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 February 2022 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC83A3A0A70 for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:22:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NTiShmyYy8RD for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C2F3A096B for <t2trg@irtf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:22:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.78.77]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D945A1F44B for <t2trg@irtf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C2EF91A01CE; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:22:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: t2trg@irtf.org
In-reply-to: <164391526340.31272.7439099289162707225@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164391526340.31272.7439099289162707225@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to internet-drafts@ietf.org message dated "Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:07:43 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 11:22:32 -0500
Message-ID: <279505.1643991752@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/t2trg/zh8wKWqLAbgXlPKXCSJbFwLuTnQ>
Subject: [T2TRG] new Version Notification for draft-richardson-t2trg-idevid-considerations-06.txt
X-BeenThere: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Thing-to-Thing Research Group <t2trg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg/>
List-Post: <mailto:t2trg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 16:22:43 -0000

internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > Name:		draft-richardson-t2trg-idevid-considerations
    > Revision:	06
    > Title:		A Taxonomy of operational security considerations for
    > manufacturer installed keys and Trust Anchors

    > Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-richardson-t2trg-idevid-considerations-06

The diff is mostly empty, as this is just a repost.
I have not had the time and enthusiasm to pursue this document.

I was tasked in 2020 with getting reviews from industry.  I have talked to
document up in many 1:1 meetings with many people from industry, and they all
liked it, but none have actually spent 5 minutes to write an email of
support.

I do wonder if t2trg or the IRTF/IETF is really the right place for this.
Is there another place?  ETSI? ITU-T? (but, I don't like their open-stand.org)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email