Re: [tae] [tsv-area] Transport negotiation

Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Similarly, though http is expected to live over TCP, being able to  
> explicitly override it in the URI if desired has merit in some cases.  
> That is, 'http' would be the same as writing 'http-tcp'.

   Given that there's existing work for http over sctp, and that sometimes
ambiguity is intentional and can be a good thing, I'd recommend that
plain 'http' be allowed to continue whatever ambiguity it already has, and
that we create a different access-method name for http over tcp if we
intend to forbid any transport except TCP.

   And if we define any such thing, we should consider registering it
according to RFC 4395...

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
_______________________________________________
tae mailing list
tae@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae