Re: [tae] The internet architecture

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Fri, 05 December 2008 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tae-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tae-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tae-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE30C3A6C88; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82E53A6964; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:05:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ywrF3SdPUIc; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AE53A6844; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:05:51 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,721,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="30142460"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2008 15:05:46 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mB5F5kLt002506; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:05:46 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB5F5kWd002655; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:05:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:05:46 -0500
Received: from 10.98.54.222 ([10.98.54.222]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:05:46 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.13.0.080930
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:05:45 -0500
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <C55EAD79.1838%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: The internet architecture
Thread-Index: AclW6vKkNG05j5sKQSevk9x0Ds8q7A==
In-Reply-To: <493941CB.80608@dcrocker.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2008 15:05:46.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3A98940:01C956EA]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=638; t=1228489546; x=1229353546; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20The=20internet=20architecture |Sender:=20 |To:=20Dave=20Crocker=20<dcrocker@bbiw.net>,=20Thomas=20Nar ten=20<narten@us.ibm.com>; bh=edSGvmJo/J8UlduZb91mlFe5w9mdFqAnJ+4zZaHFrNg=; b=B3k14xnndp0Rt1NBlbJ1czNS1RUxAeH3xSvZ7hCFppooi/lhr9WvylO3Rc 7kRC475ONhR7SKERrwWaAw9ZGe5npw6+j4KcZN60SuRgwTBUBo/0qru11gqq vZVVNh6tYh;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:40:50 -0800
Cc: tae@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tae] The internet architecture
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tae-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tae-bounces@ietf.org

On 12/5/08 9:59 AM, "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> If you are citing BSD because you think that they made a bad design decision,
> then you are faulting them for something that was common in the networking
> culture at the time.

Not to go too far afield, but I think there's consensus
among us old Unix folk that the mistake that CSRG made
wasn't in the use of addresses but in having "sockets"
instead of using file descriptors.  This was actually
fixed in SysVRSomethingOrOther with the introduction of
a network pseudo-filesystem (open("/net/192.168.1.1", ... )
with ioctls but never got traction.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
tae mailing list
tae@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae