Re: [tae] [tsv-area] Transport negotiation

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Thu, 04 December 2008 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tae-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tae-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tae-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE528C0E9; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD05B3A6A27; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecySV9R8dA4V; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7F73A6AA3; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118D5495FDC1; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id F0EDE280A1; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-a481dbb000000ff0-72-49380eaac0ad
Received: from [17.151.78.51] (unknown [17.151.78.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id D7B5528096; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <39ABE2CC-B0F7-42E8-A761-CCA5BFA73C09@apple.com>
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
To: tsv-area@ietf.org, tae@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <61A8651D-C795-4E84-9DD2-E53022A34B00@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:08:52 -0800
References: <3BB334D8-B00C-48C1-ACBF-4D09576DEADF@mpi-sws.org> <492C7F97.3030000@isi.edu> <EDCC4CF2-DC3C-409F-8F99-3BE51BAE4111@surrey.ac.uk> <492DE8AD.1090300@isi.edu> <7DA33930-1767-492B-807E-7A7DA661AFE9@apple.com> <5AE49824-74B1-4ABE-BBD4-7DEAFA348245@apple.com> <61A8651D-C795-4E84-9DD2-E53022A34B00@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [tae] [tsv-area] Transport negotiation
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tae-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tae-bounces@ietf.org

On Dec 4, 2008, at 01:29, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> You may want to tackle TCP vs SCTP (well, really "which *P", of  
> course) while you're at it... And don't forget relative priorities  
> so someone can say "try (my native, non-NAT) IPv4 first, then (6to4)  
> IPv6" vs "try (native) IPv6 first, then (NATed) IPv4)". Or SCTP+TCP  
> over v6, but my v4 NAT doesn't do SCTP so only TCP over v4.


I thought what I was dreaming about could already be made to do that.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering


_______________________________________________
tae mailing list
tae@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae