[tae] no NEGO BOF at the next IETF
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 28 September 2009 13:33 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1743A6987 for <tae@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-IAuwLOtEPo for <tae@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B83A6989 for <tae@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc-a80034.wlan.inet.fi (pc-a80034.wlan.inet.fi [194.111.80.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8SDYHWx063480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <tae@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:34:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-11-955853495"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:29:20 +0300
Message-Id: <9A959A6C-B36E-4BFB-90B5-A8DF2065EAB4@nokia.com>
To: tae@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.194]); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:34:41 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: [tae] no NEGO BOF at the next IETF
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:33:39 -0000
Hi, I just wanted to drop you all a quick note that after the IAB/IESG BOF call last Friday, we've decided to not approve the NEGO BOF for the next IETF in Hiroshima. One main reason was that we didn't see a whole lot of community discussion about the specific topic this BOF targets before and after the proposal was submitted. A second reason was that the proposed technical work itself was felt to be a bit too vague to kick off a standardization effort for. Note that this doesn't mean that we feel that the topic of the BOF proposal is not interesting. personally, I'd very much like to see the community agree on some work items in this space. I don't think we're quite there yet however. If you like, I could get you a room for a bar BOF in Hiroshima, or alternatively we could offer you a significant chunk of time e.g. in TSVAREA. Lars
- [tae] no NEGO BOF at the next IETF Lars Eggert