Re: [tae] [tsv-area] Transport negotiation

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Wed, 10 December 2008 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tae-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tae-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tae-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6F628C0D7; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94933A6847; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iApudZKdC0KI; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0602B3A677E; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B684A12266; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay11.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id 8C3A428087; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:24 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807130-a788fbb000000fcd-c4-4940046cece0
Received: from [17.206.42.11] (chesh1.apple.com [17.206.42.11]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 704C128097; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <494002AB.6080605@isi.edu>
References: <3BB334D8-B00C-48C1-ACBF-4D09576DEADF@mpi-sws.org> <492C7F97.3030000@isi.edu> <EDCC4CF2-DC3C-409F-8F99-3BE51BAE4111@surrey.ac.uk> <492DE8AD.1090300@isi.edu> <7DA33930-1767-492B-807E-7A7DA661AFE9@apple.com> <5AE49824-74B1-4ABE-BBD4-7DEAFA348245@apple.com> <3F1AB633-7E17-47C4-B126-D8D872B552C5@apple.com> <0191F3F9-CC3D-4925-90BC-15BC966FE012@apple.com> <78ACC2CD-C6E6-46A3-B198-0C0284917E94@apple.com> <494002AB.6080605@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Message-Id: <9CF98731-3A97-4056-AF33-64FC43E363CC@apple.com>
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:02:32 -0800
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: tae@ietf.org, tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tae] [tsv-area] Transport negotiation
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: tae-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tae-bounces@ietf.org

On 10 Dec, 2008, at 09:55, Joe Touch wrote:

> IMO, NATs need to understand the demultiplexing that is designed to be
> internal to a host exactly because of what a NAT is and what it  
> does. It
> doesn't make sense to be to bemoan that fact.
>
> Joe

I can't tell which side you are arguing. Do you believe that:

(a) demultiplexing (i.e. port numbers) should be duplicated by every  
transport layer, or
(b) demultiplexing (i.e. port numbers) should be done once, at a  
shared lower layer?

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* Internet Architecture Board
* www.stuartcheshire.org

_______________________________________________
tae mailing list
tae@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae