Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com> Mon, 29 November 2010 02:32 UTC
Return-Path: <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A64E3A6BA3; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUMpbUBoohjI; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:32:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4670B3A6BA6; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LCM00KKRKG0DA@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:33:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from c00111037 ([10.111.16.128]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LCM002HWKFZRH@szxga04-in.huawei.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:33:36 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:33:36 +0800
From: Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540DC92F71@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
To: "'Ali C. Begen (abegen)'" <abegen@cisco.com>, "'Scheffenegger, Richard'" <rs@netapp.com>, 'Mike Belshe' <mike@belshe.com>, tcpm@ietf.org
Message-id: <003801cb8f6d$d351ed00$79f5c700$%cui@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-cn
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcuNlUG/mOB0699nQE6fHFKA+8QeOgA3CztAAB9I3tAAAwxuUAAcQVdw
References: <AANLkTikrYDgAjb9yKvcc_hS12OHeydtL8uXL=qWLg1Av@mail.gmail.com> <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540DBBAB26@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0BA9624C@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540DC92F71@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
Cc: tae@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:32:44 -0000
> Sure but HTTP is not using SCTP today. Should we look into it? Sorry for digging this topic in tcpm list, but I think the guys interested in this topic also cover tcpm. I think this is an interesting item. In my remember, a Bar-BoF (or BoF) named "Negotiation BoF" was ever mentioned at IETF76 (denied by AD at that time). There is a draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-http-new-tech-00, and Dan presented this topic at IETF79, http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/tsvwg-9.pptx, Who can tell me more information about this? I missed the BoF at IETF76. Thanks and regards, Xiangsong
- Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM Xiangsong Cui
- Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM L.Wood
- Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM Xiangsong Cui