IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tao-discuss] Repo with source?

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 07 September 2021 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758F43A1A3E for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OwS9SJHbhHY for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4316B3A1A3C for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:dda5:4290:1153:a43b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF44B600373; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:56:07 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1631012167; bh=3HmfrYoWwctkUXk1c7Oovv5ILzsmcHjaRv3o2pounGU=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=VR8ok5B0i6gPdvSrEH+iiihj0SuPRK6FLxrZ0AlcXNiAOER2jgRJw67b5sh7TsGrJ sqsW4cthsKV7sMSdnLv9SDhuxqemBiXG1FnNGlrjEmQmNU60rHtzOMGJtZlY2v8wHm 9qQ4lV43MXET7ELdYlqwm/9CzVjB+C4Udai0goZc=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <6E1DF4EA-4949-4F52-841F-635CCBB6221A@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_67E53DD2-2DD2-4B44-815D-83AD2EBD73DF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 13:56:07 +0300
In-Reply-To: <afe9af1c-aca1-0a21-30ec-dc60fc5b053c@nielstenoever.net>
Cc: tao-discuss@ietf.org
To: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
References: <BF309F20-6D98-4B52-82B5-97DB179507F3@eggert.org> <06863aef-7ce3-405d-8a3b-62ab77a4e171@nielstenoever.net> <FA549CB2-680E-495D-A10B-9BB3516D6B18@eggert.org> <afe9af1c-aca1-0a21-30ec-dc60fc5b053c@nielstenoever.net>
X-MailScanner-ID: DF44B600373.A0A08
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/1Umf1OuJAPCQNgc51vg-2jb8K84>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Repo with source?
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:56:21 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-9-7, at 11:24, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
> 
> I am not against it, but only Greg and I have used the repo, so there is no immediate need. But if this the way to go organization-wide, am happy to follow along!

I think it would make sense to move it, given that it's official material of the org. (If you want to do this, you'd need to temporarily make me co-admin of the repo.)

>> I'd also suggest that we use branches and tags and to keep track of what is/was published and what is being done for a new revision. (And describe that in the README.)
> 
> Sounds like a good structured approach.

OK. Let's discuss this in https://github.com/nllz/Tao-of-the-IETF/issues/15

Thanks,
Lars

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status