IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tao-discuss] [rfc-i] 3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 01 April 2022 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C563A1837 for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5t4bjb0o6U5 for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7273A19BB for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 231IA6KR026237; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 20:12:36 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=COimSIxEogulMmybrZufO4W0l1GYqhq4L/dqp/Etu2g=; b=RTaqUiL4fG9eU13BR55Vv4i4Tk+UfKlBMvG8jFs8Qe984f1fUMHaxbcbO6Kndm6keXOC 4vdRoqT2UKQQyQ0LXqfjtxVbe6rOhKOjXrQXuR9ChGMA3TX85hgM6O+fQxQQqf1E7Qy3 rh8kNpN77U95wZSUmAtpLUECG1eo8Xza+373rqZNBNjAWE+x61fvhOstHxJiMKAnwXxX rgK5lKvfjkoNnlUHP/gQOrcYc6d8/5PVvSyaBC3alZl8ibWs2LAl1YB4S7wv0yVqMhtO IhXUzNQI5Uk8WbJFIG4gY9cTdO0ij1FfRo/4vR2r4B9rFy7zLnrYRdaMoZFcsGtqfN04 7Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3f4sr8wyv8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:12:35 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 231J7HlO016908; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:12:34 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3f1x5ytyuq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Apr 2022 15:12:34 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag4mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.5; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:12:34 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:12:33 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:12:33 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
CC: "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tao-discuss] [rfc-i] 3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)
Thread-Index: AQHYQDfUComjlE9H+E610K9BjoBDp6zQUiMAgAAMqoCAAD3TAIAD8UkAgAEI34CAAYKIAP//04SAgARuWQD//8UAAIAARKCA///6bwAACuxJgP//wdEA
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:12:32 +0000
Message-ID: <EBAE1AF7-6F4A-49F9-A168-770091773D4A@akamai.com>
References: <Yj2d4DJMFWJOxoZa@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <317196df-3363-36c9-2421-02d9e229f664@joelhalpern.com> <CO1PR11MB488130CFF42A9F309AE1E212D81A9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <95b5dab0-3eb5-536d-85fc-d428f26364ed@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBOSMRffY6cXjwn7A6d=JWDJmmBrgHxiPD-XRMTMazOjLw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48812B0C5B88C190FB4A28ECD81D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7042bc99-5d14-993c-198b-1080b4ff5636@gmail.com> <CH0PR02MB8291A7A9598871412C035882D61E9@CH0PR02MB8291.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com> <CO1PR11MB488179A425A1E1BF98174CE6D8E09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <201561AA-D2A0-4ED2-AB9E-BEAA4B6162E2@akamai.com> <CO1PR11MB488164E21B70A0C67DEB788CD8E09@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <F6CD4F4E-8DA1-471A-93F8-FC855C28B6A2@akamai.com> <172f086c-664f-73c9-7e5f-5ecf3d374240@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <172f086c-664f-73c9-7e5f-5ecf3d374240@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <40D1EE0AE5F04845AC568209DA54AFDB@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.850 definitions=2022-04-01_05:2022-03-30, 2022-04-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204010091
X-Proofpoint-GUID: Mdrax1idyMnnKztbFvStPBg3oOAZjvQM
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Mdrax1idyMnnKztbFvStPBg3oOAZjvQM
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-01_05,2022-03-31_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=972 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204010091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/LCNu_uVQH9CGofUQDOKEDvf8ZjE>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] [rfc-i] 3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:14:06 -0000

>    > What *did* change is that I removed those words from the Tao (proposed; has to be approved by the IESG) 

>    Not without community review, surely?

The IESG has to review all Tao changes, per RFC 6722. That is unchanged. I recorded your concern as an issue, https://github.com/ietf/tao/issues/44 which includes a pointer to full message and therefore discussion thread.

The GitHub repo where these changes were made had a small group of people involved, including Lars, Neils, and Greg Wood. That is not to say that everyone agreed with everything I proposed, but all my changes were done as pull requests that were reviewed before being merged.

I have no idea what is involved in IESG review, if they've done it in the past, nor how long it will take, and I certainly have no idea what kind of feedback they will provide. I should also mention that I am not committing to do further work on this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email