Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 20:52 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE883A17F5; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x04eXkOhpNoi; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC4633A1780; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w7so6575135pfu.11; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfxbhSLggnozeWAqOrP6cymSeysXNbR2OrsMX5TeXYk=; b=p3AtYfw7MSLfYYOM81vAThdFRrrwX+t4GNbdCGnqeJDc330fYdTy02yynCA/UD+m3x /RBfjfbtSeTpjIo6Ae+kkk6gIvZ1fczur2tE8Bg68jqB1mVKAzXxrnzIldhNg0d1P2xE C2nXMrP+wquVsmkqGZPSF2nJxU18LZqFh+6ucDZSg267y+C3g0Ecreg/kK5563fqdudy sGt+IFgwwBoDoHM2KfPI+0Iw7jGFQRg6C9d/DUFgn0sAnQ4qjCNGt7dL6wU4+qWWdkks G2qNTtUNt0khLd9zPDgSYKL8ekorJ3h34nEKUT7DcQ+AfFIF3BkIezbMyjPDlz3myXlA 8iGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfxbhSLggnozeWAqOrP6cymSeysXNbR2OrsMX5TeXYk=; b=s+c7fE1LfA6oCD4arWvodCstS6f9z4pchIja1wzM7kq9jUAmj+KHakIwg3N4B1I91Z k5f4c0BaUHwrq77A8UT9h/r68kna0vwTqLCZrkxRWwMhbbL8WsLJN163B8zrCeTPP5zl N348m0FBhtHPrr1tXgmoPnf9y9dbn1ofzRv6ittZfoF7z15DCB2B3qeMrUV2Z7JpkoXd fE4FjqCZhrXAh1zUqn6F4h0LAHqjpIBaA7WoIWNPVxFGKXTIypG5zST1JTZnKNsxlpGQ lBK+80fqHbtsQZN5PItc71FQmvFTn3A0sTyLnFe56RK05L25H7D4h2b2T9gNOTln8xg8 owQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Oqb9cTmY/QNn3wkWK6hzzt4RNlD1xXyMwIm2UQPcr8W++LLyA cQPKgI2ETnGooB7nDr2hezbY/06+V2Aw7w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySGRPLd7XuZ0nAtV9j9mDgCZHl8sI0+7TnrYmtNGifSG1Dh4wpyyEJrXIMfEL3Ee2I6drCzw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f412:0:b0:381:28f:85dd with SMTP id g18-20020a63f412000000b00381028f85ddmr12666231pgi.319.1649364763701; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16-20020a056a000b5000b004faed463907sm24926552pfo.0.2022.04.07.13.52.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net> <0192FFCD-2410-415B-90B2-248F2823CC97@eggert.org> <D6FFB194-FBC9-4AC1-B29F-B00A9A3C2E3E@akamai.com> <C41F2B92-1216-4A2F-99D8-611D0457AE97@eggert.org> <D91F9FE6-4641-4C7D-92A7-CE6F57AD00FC@akamai.com> <fb4d1b71-a13c-b98d-be48-cd2d4007a909@gmail.com> <E61D013F-3F7E-4216-A7DC-1DF10B015EF5@akamai.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <de3eb2cf-65cb-4d4b-f017-2d3f31f58707@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 08:52:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E61D013F-3F7E-4216-A7DC-1DF10B015EF5@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/MA4MiXflzz-SMdQA8SGdvNqse5Y>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:52:51 -0000
On 08-Apr-22 08:46, Salz, Rich wrote: >> And there's the bug. Not only the lack of IESG review, but also the lack of community review, of our face presented to the world. > > The Tao is not the fact we present to the world: the homepage is. The Tao is one page among many on that site. I tried, and could not generate a web-search query that showed "Tao.html" in the first page of results. Can you? Haven't tried. However, I meant the whole web site. It would all benefit from community review. Brian
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revisio… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Review R… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Warren Kumari
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Jay Daley
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Greg Wood
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert