Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC8E3A1762; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVXi9ioEn7Hr; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97BD3A1750; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 237J32TN031928; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:46:09 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=P++8keksr5+JzbzCVWmUGnA7zPNMuDvxOLGBDY+Hsb4=; b=k+HHArPUpzqUz99R4WSlsZBa+Doshw2ESnvQDNpC/xgMyS1e0yTw+Pkjx9m+4+w/FzFC 8KN9oj7XXjpH4smO4k0fZY5e8/Q7eBXifB3AMZUaJoALuxRMssNcx3NhW449ETG5B9Dx Jj5gjBO5+h8IATv3LvbhVYgGWmwECgClshB99uuTPuv/fcZNyv6cOa7wXsjxZV1KUk5o AkVb+hTYW8zRhMMOT+bvyjJ6YMRgIFtMgwnG2CXkxh+vtDnRpQ6futu5xk52Kj6Ersxy dW2jjs7tFB5DfnTOcDYR1+ElgVLgFW99YEdvzLHJ8D7/2u+8VKSGLRhZgfSYGPyKUR9H Ig==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3f9qmkq2ug-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 21:46:09 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 237KYmja024608; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:46:08 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.27]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3f6htys3xg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:46:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) by usma1ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:46:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:46:07 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:46:07 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
Thread-Index: AQHYSo5NLFc3l2diPkS/dmSAKyaCaKzk0tGA///QyoCAAFUaAP//5E6AgABPJYD//7+8AA==
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:46:07 +0000
Message-ID: <E61D013F-3F7E-4216-A7DC-1DF10B015EF5@akamai.com>
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net> <0192FFCD-2410-415B-90B2-248F2823CC97@eggert.org> <D6FFB194-FBC9-4AC1-B29F-B00A9A3C2E3E@akamai.com> <C41F2B92-1216-4A2F-99D8-611D0457AE97@eggert.org> <D91F9FE6-4641-4C7D-92A7-CE6F57AD00FC@akamai.com> <fb4d1b71-a13c-b98d-be48-cd2d4007a909@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb4d1b71-a13c-b98d-be48-cd2d4007a909@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D0493B7E73F5494088AB003DB5B2A2DA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.858 definitions=2022-04-07_05:2022-04-07, 2022-04-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=803 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070101
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: _Vfjcc1peOTJWYdSxHy-1FVuuGPsSGOZ
X-Proofpoint-GUID: _Vfjcc1peOTJWYdSxHy-1FVuuGPsSGOZ
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-07_05,2022-04-07_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=771 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070101
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/Z3pclGXo7ntuknL-GsTFcK9f45k>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:46:39 -0000

>    And there's the bug. Not only the lack of IESG review, but also the lack of community review, of our face presented to the world.

The Tao is not the fact we present to the world: the homepage is.  The Tao is one page among many on that site.  I tried, and could not generate a web-search query that showed "Tao.html" in the first page of results.  Can you?