[tao-discuss] Further re-use of Tao content
Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Thu, 13 June 2024 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36B0C14F61E for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LD2V0BCtlzpv for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D02C14F5E8 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42281d8cd2dso11020075e9.3 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1718313189; x=1718917989; darn=ietf.org; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+mDgtiPR5cTo+y9JQHv6lvM92kDzpiv5cTlIZVhRURU=; b=hK7zNYbhP+tnoa568mmwUTXw/36vyJ06cKt5XPImOhrKpPwJyY3ebe/qyxdF40Ek7N hDio6tfozQUri/7xG7UW+BRMHgw/EV83gtT6GSklCa57KCOp/y3peGPh+patn2l03/oJ cO2XARcBxcQG4jOn5JER1Xzcn55foOOg4epvXmsJxul3p0VbKoF5kMWpCsbWPwQQtxKU KskZMsPmJ2mvB6qL+dSl6pmU5kMZK52MT2yCu+HxBybVp92POabdpzjNsjJSHgFcFln5 kE1ZrIv70hY8gEBCROTDvsUVsq9KmU4EufwpKikaLALM9N/0ZFDC0NB7FAtTQG1oTZSZ sdjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718313189; x=1718917989; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+mDgtiPR5cTo+y9JQHv6lvM92kDzpiv5cTlIZVhRURU=; b=aBkwnQRPOMmpb9ua7aV3pv2i30omrmkGJJRYfpXNEmR8je13cbppPCTVuJtncHyuLx 8NxVoN+jFACuC5sZrwk00oTkN1vC0CErb/lbM6FISJtbYpU7GxHSvv/GxErcYHcUM4CR EAgds5Pzp1P1kuiWrqn/q0bS8kdtxbfkWl5j/6+elJc6+kcai39+L9ZMp/nMLsYnlE5d aELFS1AOK8zDB1EBuzqsjICI95kjf13dAOBAbNDwdIjMD7hfcY0s5OpUPH3tEXp/B8UL 2WT4Ayuv0TT5j9QOGkF9wlB0bCWw9wBYZJS+Q0ra1wpebSrKrKgFPb28TNH1DotiFITq XDSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdVGm3JWTfbxjbBfqsjPvTm/cO0SX/2jgkyEAgLPdzcn4GO5Dd PcdBnI4h8mQhCAMWS+mVnFX1/nip3sNwSCkmF1b97EUhZNJ5glSvmrxjcqqtZrF5M7ShUW8UN40 pX10=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE9e1KSk7JbuAW661JZo3YCHJi8eZpTZb3X4ijvXTnQwOzQ7i7tk48mcGjpg4F3PDJ3g2sQ4Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a07:b0:421:7f07:92c3 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42304828b2dmr7685545e9.19.1718313189011; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (host-92-27-125-209.static.as13285.net. [92.27.125.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-360750ad177sm2673550f8f.56.2024.06.13.14.13.08 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Message-Id: <23DC27E1-68C8-48AE-8768-1435AFC73B6C@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:13:03 +0100
To: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: 2QLLALZLQKYDXMRQMJNBSWXPGYX3UL3Q
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2QLLALZLQKYDXMRQMJNBSWXPGYX3UL3Q
X-MailFrom: jay@staff.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tao-discuss.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tao-discuss] Further re-use of Tao content
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/aaKKJT3MUZWfcr-EOGcKwwNqDsY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tao-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tao-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tao-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
As per previous emails, this is to update you on progress on reuse of Tao content in other pages. 1. The main revised page is "Bringing new work to the IETF" (was "Proposing new work") https://www.ietf.org/process/new-work/. This includes Tao content and content from multiple other pages that covered the same subject. One point to note though, the IETF Chair has questioned if the following bullet should still be included, particularly the part about XML, or if that needs to be made clearer: > * **Is this an Internet-layer protocol or related operational best practice?**. The IETF does not standardize transmission hardware (we leave that to organizations like the IEEE and the ITU) and does not standardize specialized application layer protocols. For example, we leave HTML and XML standards to the World-Wide Web Consortium. But the IETF does standardize all the protocol layers in between, from IP itself up to general applications like email and HTTP. 2. The content about IPR has now been included at the end of https://www.ietf.org/process/ipr/ 3. The entire section on WGs was included in https://www.ietf.org/process/wgs/ some time ago. 4. The liaison content has not been reused because https://www.ietf.org/about/liaisons/ already covers it. I expect to make one more update on the remaining Tao content to be reused and then that’s it. JAy -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director exec-director@ietf.org