Re: [tao-discuss] New version of the "Tao of the IETF" published

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F32C15339E for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9aV725b3rwVj for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ED4C15339D for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id b23so2743322pfp.9 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=X7HcqK4tjGyCdoa8MZ8i3sOJ4cZY3JpJlbireM/ErA8=; b=aC+5CMMckUGgzBNvlEzUF/ZWWpZSLVxVHhkjhEJ8hgJjREL9eJgZzUZMPXdXU6PJpf 3JmEKN3K6ecDqDilgzFEW48Uqs0eDHssgq9/XcBfnSIY79UYJiodP9a/6Tz/DMo7i665 T9d0kn+RVhCUjYWF6fIyQU56utdgNIIntQlLXT88aKLsozA4XHHkjjnr8HhbnigdHZu7 jqzVhMCj55R1x5W5dV3dI+cfBnLViK5WDSuk+23mVUi3UgMZx5hRwjA84Y872g2OPUwv XCCbEpl9cYbe3aQnVFD8WZ2O9c9AzTj79SWIvYgFx6FK0QsOXpKwZptMs+rAihAcOenY iYog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=X7HcqK4tjGyCdoa8MZ8i3sOJ4cZY3JpJlbireM/ErA8=; b=NS30o6nd2tj3fB7ntdQskFOoxGMfyqy/iGWjTL10T+WhAUfzoVqHeiIDTeJ3VwG3uR LPNaeb283XQSknEtDYxE2NOH4njrXdHM4jnqoPh5wV52py9/IcFqjNg46oHbr+qnML0h 3Z5NnAxT0k+leIYBAaxUc4VIB0ZLwEDNYJpZz4W1ILQ4srvOHAQDadOyD/a6igFiwflN ZRDTaxZiW9mhzG4u4C3Z+HNLWBZlB/gaUcHT5/CGolX+176w0yLUPOburA8m5L3rlqtO vcqQr1KLTKQ24bEGJHpW+PTOwX3xr5Enj6Mb5ZJ6Yc79c+oXm6g4jRf5WVFl13Rn0GEl ZBDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0pim095C3er7LWc8wmVYbbdo2LowD/ULvnBmRNn1WXJU6rZklG C5Nxw3ysB8yD5iCPturC4ttyqqlVG/3Qkg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6OlfDCd4T0Qh8WZaCVC+NuSOi67cuXueceaOowidbj3bW9EK0sehZWZQdxZKJcqYO+sU9SHg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:450f:0:b0:430:491e:ed5c with SMTP id s15-20020a63450f000000b00430491eed5cmr13446682pga.330.1662756835608; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:1124:9301:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1124:9301:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9-20020a170902f68900b0016be596c8afsm821245plg.282.2022.09.09.13.53.53 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3b2e53fb-999f-7b66-4863-336d4fac4ad2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 08:53:51 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: tao-discuss@ietf.org
References: <64E2EB34-AD95-479D-BCE8-998967380C04@ietf.org> <85c844e3-f5f1-6851-e4d6-f57e837fe159@joelhalpern.com> <5ea192bf-b64c-47bb-b98b-d7474619a569@nielstenoever.net> <a9de220b-b79a-b709-2761-b84758a354ba@joelhalpern.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9de220b-b79a-b709-2761-b84758a354ba@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/jIv89ukNGc_v6ZAgzZEncqLtStI>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] New version of the "Tao of the IETF" published
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 20:54:08 -0000

Also, I'm not aware that the IESG in any way reviews IAB stream RFCs or the new Editorial scheme RFCs (although of course IESG members may do so as individuals).

A broader point: I hope that minor edits like this can be processed very rapidly.

Regards
    Brian

On 10-Sep-22 06:58, Joel Halpern wrote:
> That, the IESG reviewing all IDs for RFC publication, is why I suggested the second modification.  My concern is that although the IESG does indeed review IRTF and ISE documents, the review choices, criteria, votes, etc. are not those you carefully (and accurately) list for the IETF stream.  So I was looking for someway to simply avoid the inaccuracy.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Joel
> 
> On 9/9/2022 1:48 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> Is it not the case that the IESG also reviews  the other stream RFCs to ensure that there is no overlap?  I thought that is how it is described in several process documents, at least I  case for IRTF RFCs, but i think also for IS.
>>
>> But then of course theory and practice might vary.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>> On 9 Sep 2022, at 18:46, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>
>>     I do not want to be too picky.  I understand that it is impossible to
>>     get the wording of the Tao perfect.  And I understand that it does not
>>     need to be precise or complete in describing our process.  (If it were,
>>     it would likely be unreadable.)
>>
>>     However, in the section describing the IESG processing of RFCs, I see
>>     that the text claims that the IESG reviews EACH (emphasis added) drafts
>>     that are becoming RFCs.  And the text as written implies that in all
>>     cases those reviews result in ballots with the described positions.
>>     However, that is not the case,  IRTF drafts and Independent Stream
>>     drafts do not get that treatment.   When we next edit this, could we
>>     change that slightly?
>>
>>     Maybe make it "each IETF produced RFC"?  Or at the section that says "As
>>     part of the document reviews" make that "For IETF produced RFCs, as part
>>     of the document reviews"?  (I would have used "stream" rather than
>>     "produced" but I think that might be confusing for newcomers as they
>>     often are not familiar with RFC streams.)
>>
>>     Yours,
>>
>>     Joel
>>
>>     On 9/9/2022 10:27 AM, IETF Chair wrote:
>>
>>         [Forwarding this on behalf of the Tao editors - Lars] Dear all, I am very happy to announce the new version of the Tao of the IETF [0]. This version significantly benefited from suggestions and contributions by the community, most notably from Rich Salz, for which I as editor am very thankful. This publication would also not have been possible without the support of Greg Wood and the review of the IESG. The IESG requested for future iterations to have smaller changes, so I intend to increase the publication pace. However, this also depends on the discussion about the future of the Tao. Best, Niels Editor of the Tao PS New suggestions are of course always welcome on tao-discuss and on Github as PR (https://github.com/ietf/tao/blob/main/Tao.md) [0] https://ietf.org/tao
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce 
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     tao-discuss mailing list
>>     tao-discuss@ietf.org
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tao-discuss mailing list
>> tao-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tao-discuss mailing list
> tao-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss