Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2022 05:19 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98403A077A; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQoji-VZ0qQZ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267E53A0764; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id q19so795740pgm.6; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wn1ZKWsVYh4zrcjLWukK6TRim+/6rm04+G4B+1FHsFE=; b=YC4Q2Sw5tFst+pe3tiR8o2FFH3uxNeEaiRmJGCGAOifSJZG5ruTgU7ZWMO8ptIv7vz tslV9drV80Pw3KH8HdORTKhbhU7q6fI512cQ3LbOfOtLfQtdHLa4oFaO2fwFVjG9tphC c42hyuPRxhfWxeNC37V4Mk+1MLga/mfSUHUTSrvBrAhGeVRwCVcbkjjhfjA5+YY1l0Ss UPX+Lxzrvoq6CzRa+eKgKq63Gic3Aa4hsTXOJYLFFnOT8ftanPMopfZVWqGYfAA4PJgV JlaL0ul3wntUJ7FnsXOWLW1VBweqHGDaaw0ihGnIxVxvw72PhpMOi5tr4uZqCkV7wWj6 qtZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wn1ZKWsVYh4zrcjLWukK6TRim+/6rm04+G4B+1FHsFE=; b=fSYQQb+J2qBiUStLM5yAlPuWbh37s05pLvXGH6PzQrU1JeL/Zeoyon+JgeQGgJPqDc mPS+fwoL9QFzYHw4T0fCZQsg+LJQMbwOjIf+96haw6mYwjVqLv0rRQkBYYqO0Ex4PZOo r98r4vTK67ShRorrGgR+z7HG+jIBbKsWoyFXHnMc6UkRPVFqhn+wZ9A1ieudJ9bpvYZa 9o0L36zjVf4x/gr9phbKs3+exqTdbCDxpvKQrzJp7fxOm9DYjYgwO9hKiptJLdP5arJS xPy0GXt3j1qiMfJ8cdq9kNUkbB1SW7hz7S0cA0e5h+NDwhi+Vg/79xBy6jEUtWoF5PnV 9yRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530r+T45RAU4qW2zctCoz8gVETvPQK9UKhpqA19TCP1bKfOC6b87 ZojuwQXAtJJtPhz/azwavIlgLo3RxkiLLA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGkeW1JUaDplViSG1qW39eJjBmDPjEHtd5ysw30JzqGGtTgdAlfKH4n3Ssm2gS0g6EmSrZuA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc4a:0:b0:39d:4f3:66a7 with SMTP id q10-20020a63cc4a000000b0039d04f366a7mr19747288pgi.48.1649827174891; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3-20020a17090aa78300b001ca7dfab2e4sm1294492pjq.25.2022.04.12.22.19.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: tao-discuss@ietf.org
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <45a73c1d-0564-10a6-4243-bf1a209da307@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:19:29 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/oO-dIYjR4ivprG6cWh982tQsvbI>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:19:39 -0000
Hi, Not having write access to the repo, it seems I can't issue a PR. I have a branch and a PR ready to go, with a modest number of minor fixes, if someone can authorize becarpenter. Here are some points from the old Tao that I can't find in the proposed update: > Marshall Rose once remarked that the IETF was a place to go for "many > fine lunches and dinners". This statement from the old Tao has disappeared. I think that's a shame, but to restore it, some explanation would have to be added. > WG chairs are advised to participate in the WG chairs lunch mid-week... That doesn't seem to be mentioned any more. Was that intentional? > However, some WG chairs never manage to get their WG to finish,... This topic seems to have vanished. Do we want to pretend it never happens? > Some Working Groups have complex documents or a complex set of documents > (or even both)... Ditto. But it leads to those terrible AUTH48 delays. Do we want to pretend that never happens either? > If a participant makes significant contributions, the document editor or > chair can invite the participant to become a co-author or co-editor, ... This point seems to have got lost too. Regards Brian
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revisio… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Review R… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Warren Kumari
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Jay Daley
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Greg Wood
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Revi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Rev… Lars Eggert