[tao-discuss] Obsolete References in the Tao
"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 20:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1251512DC4C for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9G7LMaHZ5Ltl for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BB812DC49 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mutabilis-2.local ([173.57.161.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u5GKWoJ5049436 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:32:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [173.57.161.14] claimed to be mutabilis-2.local
To: tao-discuss@ietf.org
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <afe75475-8078-640f-a3db-5c3d7d5a05af@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:32:50 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/u4LgKqHt4O5zUWP10VRZ2W0U-_g>
Subject: [tao-discuss] Obsolete References in the Tao
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:32:53 -0000
Hi all, I was poking through the Tao today because I was trying to answer a WG question and landed on an obsolete reference. I found that the following in the Tao References section are obsolete: [BCP10] Galvin, J., “IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees”, BCP 10, RFC 3777, June 2004. [RFC2223] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, “Instructions to RFC Authors”, RFC 2223, October 1997. Also, the References section points to documents on tools.ietf.org. I think that pointing to the Datatracker would be handier (for mailing list search, etc.). Thanks! Jean
- [tao-discuss] Obsolete References in the Tao A. Jean Mahoney