[tao-discuss] Blue sheets - minor but substantive.

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB06C15339E for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FklQwZRkb2L0 for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FCDC15339C for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MPTQW56Skz1pNtS for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1662758371; bh=AuC3aJASvGS3GG2ni2FwbuiTK8Cdw7AXmZeXfT98So8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=AlPAtX20PVwXy1qQ8rqtGyjyqWEd7lSV7KpjIiiCAeSHsR8RQ6jytggDDgdbb4Sfs juhmK/D0pOUzQ8qXNwuG2omjq3tHjOnNhgCCePsKxYWfgFhuFnovU4zohdPSRArN36 LTu3jTV2qE20eUQjQQ/8Fe7S7KQNe+YMFicTctlE=
X-Quarantine-ID: <zR5bJA9yGk2G>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.181] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MPTQW2KzVz1nytX for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d4a3b575-b47d-6836-0164-6971b90996ba@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 17:19:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/xIULvH9XxwALmJkBUhLYIlQbuFg>
Subject: [tao-discuss] Blue sheets - minor but substantive.
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 21:19:35 -0000

In an example of what my justify the new approach to the Tao (I am 
noting this since I was one of the folks expressing concern about the 
approach), the second paragraph of section 3.5 is no longer factual, and 
may well be misleading.  As I understand it, the plan is to stick with 
the electronic blue sheets from here on (can anyone confirm or 
contradict that?)


Thanks,

Joel