Re: [tap] Wakey wakey

Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com> Tue, 02 March 2010 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317493A8B70 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:54:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAjHOwkqVj0Y for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n6b.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n6b.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D7DE3A8A8F for <tap@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [74.6.228.94] by n6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:54:51 -0000
Received: from [76.13.10.160] by t1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:54:51 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:54:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 867952.55537.bm@omp101.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 94972 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Mar 2010 15:54:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267545291; bh=Qm5wXK5b2W2+ysky3oMIpznw91oLMh92z+af70qq5SY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mDs5Z98hconA+HqJT3jEWIMT8vcgIW3giGAhJUTUy0+e0SXaxfNZQCVDbmbsDxnJwQmhHj3ipsxHkApBVL94Df6dJ4W9TLfMA/ShzZ0yNehASKb/CScUSfczPBrjDc5Tq8qa+82iNtSZq0hD/IzB9CysCf0PGjcGtc343XCrD4M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iia16Ntd+EDThtzdIdlSwzAwFhm22dP+fFZF+ucBInoS+bdkhQLvr2I1hPje89pCTMK5WEZe9BkQdDCgq4ERT3JSKPpXPMNruc14k7u71d1weEXf1SxQvxuw9eSsMyHNyP+yjJ4Z1PDOpz9s4vp1KMOHGpBZMy//7wZPKVzp1rg=;
Message-ID: <727583.94791.qm@web65714.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: M9_8cE4VM1n6Et1ChX99ZqklMkLl0y2v2JQEQBPfrU0uess1f5iNzMznvPOGWJKeNORxyg_PO86nB5fZVUza_osA2Dck35IYCTjz6ZJ8b7Qo32OxeRvULKYrpMBjILP1pBWswf1yvdEu51qLosvWj529yMmcT57gaJkc3KlYpW1ncsR9i8zBR7QcNYp7pcKA_TbzhDgXU2CSMGY72_Lh5VHL9UKrrqzBl9LcoQXz1H9bNYQ52SCPuVA7ELrFrXqkzQw8I3y1aRBYt1ZoCaeiOa.Bvp2KtSrxLsm1L8VgG0dV3oqcv_.kqMz0R1fMlY7sbECTV1XXc2tSbx5ffzwE7Z9wM2oI
Received: from [10.161.48.239] by web65714.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:54:51 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:54:51 -0800
From: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
To: Gaurav Vaidya <gaurav@ggvaidya.com>, Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1003021632570.2167@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: TAP <tap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tap] Wakey wakey
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:54:55 -0000

--- On Tue, 2/3/10, Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org> wrote:

> From: Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org>

> Time to wake this baby again, now that the Perl QA
> hackathon in Vienna is closing in. :)
> 
> About the XML version of the document:
> 
>   http://github.com/gaurav/test-anything-protocol/blob/master/draft-vaidya-test-anything-protocol-00.xml
> 
> Are we considering this one the authoritative version now?
> (Just to be clear.)

Why are '#' characters not allowed in descriptions?

  my $builder = Test::Builder->new;
  $builder->todo_start('hash mark filtering not implemented')
  unlike $result, qr/#/, 'Result does not contain #';
  $builder->todo_end;

Sometimes that's something may want in a description and it reads naturally.  I'd like to see the hash mark (octothorpe, whatever), escaped:

  ok 3 - Result does not contain \# # TODO hash mark filtering unimplemented

> Gaurav Vaidya said:
> > 
> > Our bigger issues are: we're still missing an "IANA
> considerations" section (do we need it? The JSON RFC has
> one, but perhaps we can get by without an explicit
> 'application/tap' MIME type for now?). We also have atleast
> the CRLF/LF and encoding to sort out, but adapting the
> wording from the XML specification doesn't seem too hard.

Might be nice to have.  What are the implications?

Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book         - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Tech blog            - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
Twitter              - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl
Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6