Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
Shlomi Fish <shlomif@iglu.org.il> Tue, 02 March 2010 22:27 UTC
Return-Path: <shlomif@iglu.org.il>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 2CAA728C252 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:27:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.643,
RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SARE_RECV_BEZEQINT_B=0.763]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRonUT-L0Nx7 for
<tap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vhost1.heptagon.co.il
(ec2-79-125-24-251.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com [79.125.24.251]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86428C19F for <tap@ietf.org>;
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vhost1.heptagon.co.il
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C476A89700; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:27:23 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vhost1.heptagon.co.il
Received: from vhost1.heptagon.co.il ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(vhost1.heptagon.co.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id
xX7IC28ysboL; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:27:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from telaviv1.shlomifish.org (unknown [62.219.139.216]) by
vhost1.heptagon.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B3E88733;
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:27:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@iglu.org.il>
To: tap@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 00:26:47 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.0 (Linux/2.6.33-desktop-1mnb; KDE/4.4.0; i686; ; )
References: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1003021642090.2167@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
<D3EE5777-B71C-48C8-86D4-C8D5BB72C403@hexten.net>
In-Reply-To: <D3EE5777-B71C-48C8-86D4-C8D5BB72C403@hexten.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201003030026.48203.shlomif@iglu.org.il>
Subject: Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>,
<mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>,
<mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:27:30 -0000
On Tuesday 02 Mar 2010 23:26:15 Andy Armstrong wrote: > On 2 Mar 2010, at 15:52, Salve J Nilsen wrote: > > So, what do people think? Should the TAP spec use "stream" instead of > > "document" where "document" is used now? > > stream++ > > Maybe there'd be a context in which one would want to refer to a TAP > document but stream should be the default I think. +1 to stream++ too. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ List of Portability Libraries - http://shlom.in/port-libs Deletionists delete Wikipedia articles that they consider lame. Chuck Norris deletes deletionists whom he considers lame. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
- [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Ovid
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Andy Armstrong
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Shlomi Fish
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Aristotle Pagaltzis