Re: [tap] Weird thought for the day: "skip 71 - reason"

Andy Armstrong <andy@hexten.net> Fri, 05 March 2010 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hexten.net>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F933A7B33 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:03:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_EQ_STATICB=1.372]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FODvI80PuI0S for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eric.hexten.net (static.185.67.40.188.clients.your-server.de [188.40.67.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FB528C17B for <tap@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eric.hexten.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD79103A025; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eric.hexten.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eric.hexten.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6Vdgk6awhTD; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.8.0.30] (unknown [10.8.0.30]) by eric.hexten.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BECE103A014; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:03:47 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Andy Armstrong <andy@hexten.net>
In-Reply-To: <411886.95806.qm@web65707.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:03:45 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9F21163-EC5A-4023-BD5D-9FCF60A86FBE@hexten.net>
References: <411886.95806.qm@web65707.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
To: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: tap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tap] Weird thought for the day: "skip 71 - reason"
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:03:47 -0000

On 5 Mar 2010, at 15:53, Ovid wrote:
> Here's what I would like to see.
> 
> 1..5
> ok 1 - some test
> ok 2 - another test
> skip 3 - skip cuz I said so
> skip 4 - skip, skip, baby
> ok 5 -final test
> 
> 
> In other words, you can't introduce ambiguity here.
> 
> Though this list is for ietf, those who really care about TAP are hopefully reading this.
> 
> Thoughts?  Something corresponding for TODO (less needed due to less ambiguity)?


It makes more sense - but raises a wider question about how much of the grammar we're prepared to change. Are we saying that for TAP v14 we can basically change anything?

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten