Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com> Tue, 02 March 2010 15:56 UTC
Return-Path: <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D943A8B69 for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id an6nzC+65yib for <tap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n3c.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n3c.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.13.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA1B28C160 for <tap@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [76.13.13.26] by n3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:56:49 -0000
Received: from [76.13.10.165] by t3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:56:49 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp106.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Mar 2010 15:56:49 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 289866.861.bm@omp106.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 6109 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Mar 2010 15:56:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267545409; bh=0SruMgD/dyR3JHuWuk3C+VdlyAT+Bg6guo1BV4zjrpo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SG79nCG/5LFuWVoWcyvI4HQxGZ9B/4tsu7Cfy7lCGBCif4VemNt7exvPIWcNwEyq8FGw3ROhUk+LrXnYpglKwEOMWcgiTi2Fn8+Xe3QXeQj0UUuOwqPVjE88k9iCQMA5RZwSfGjUzsmPbzmbyHRdKZaoPB6wvSn3ZdHYVFdsjxQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=W10kMTcRZNqUqsK5gfi5hlZ3G/rdlNgO3DoczN9uPQ3OjMuIOOUJANHTojlmc+dIcYqoEARI+sghe54n0gassyhCirEbzkBnzfzA2d0j73zSXYn7bCQX5rCu5/BEV4dCQ/qqMlC4IYUlKbtqZUipCUlyzYva7IeHVhTjZA9GR/s=;
Message-ID: <147817.5984.qm@web65706.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 6qKX1mYVM1lX1E.OEmOBiVx_OhKNZ43Zs9qtEZbHNcUr62EjYn1YsS_sno4CQE3GPh1TtDNrhVReEvEB3o_C2YtIRDtmsUkV6U.jGuVeteoiLzR9uOsdk958TDFVn6Swq_1ybBJ.1Sx9Rwg4Wafq.wUpcrhuDxJFewg0E7c9_a9_0aHjUVCt.XB7ivdUbTxGViy6e2Nm01LCbVb1lmGcTBa.TSDt0zZ2eIiw7PRHzNGtSMjmcXF4AZEwgVysUccp.qxT9To9ND5GZwoEt.dXKrcCBqRNlk3Lyo_NoDRpcMM60gZ1BlAMh2LMazYADf.DCgkh8Vn.fBvqi113W84kLjABXoZ1_w--
Received: from [10.161.48.239] by web65706.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:56:48 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:56:48 -0800
From: Ovid <publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com>
To: The TAP Crowd <tap@ietf.org>, Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1003021642090.2167@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream
X-BeenThere: tap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: publiustemp-tapx@yahoo.com
List-Id: Test Anything Protocol WG discussions <tap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap>
List-Post: <mailto:tap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap>, <mailto:tap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:56:52 -0000
--- On Tue, 2/3/10, Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org> wrote: > From: Salve J Nilsen <sjn@pvv.org> > "Document" gives 110-ish hits and "stream" about 370 hits. > Should we try to standardize on "stream" in the TAP spec? It should say "stream". One problem with many XML test formats is that you must have the entire document to analyze results. This is not needed for a TAP stream. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
- [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Ovid
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Andy Armstrong
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Shlomi Fish
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Salve J Nilsen
- Re: [tap] Bikeshed: TAP document vs. TAP stream Aristotle Pagaltzis