Re: [Taps] finishing things

tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5E212008D for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:09:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9sRU3d4lOGRp for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00094.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A453A120C04 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:09:07 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CIQZpnfkz0Mbfyr5EF1zK7K3KBqefTQwK+NPp1eLUEE6r+Td3g8+cHNTDDDZBOkMI0Q5skQ/YFJnvHL3X1s7XFtEVhZEzRm9Nkl1WTukn/0xfJG+2bBl6giB0VyGKxrQGGcKfYXpsv0yMQx/pe0cvx0pYzzU1o7NjecqWtK65XG7OmRJ+qUBTKkjl6wGhqLpEHnlTnNsNAgHEcb2ob5rE/Y9nbO4LRsWYn7gB6d5FYBUEw5+MTKR68puo+eNkqLuf08BPxcg29aMo7/WB/lPy0jL+/6UMjZjQ3MPgFDwLyACJ8kQsIhmdvOSRCbktkrVEzqBn9/JJcrkQJFJFnghUA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9crVhTclWvLFViVhIxRtAMb81MH/uLGbomJipw2fNX4=; b=MUmcrgMucRIo7BAp+WgjtI/wuRsG2Oi7jhxyOPcHolWw5JEssl0ueC48HMgdB/iKhhcNGIsW95r9S2JMNPgi4Mw8rQMGazEJgwTYFG762JVv+j0XkBM5RnPKU7gllaUC3DrFNHMt+6YDVTCXXmzH77j9swoc9GdXnrKZdyO0KYD2DJnUvfvF6qZJkWW0F0z3sAHzvGsBbFBhT5P89FCOAo6ur2yP3d1+rUw/WjK8EQt/JI5tVC0eYXnoDEw3U1hWbaa3a1EHcQE0up5W/kEzssTqzTZSgOGpr7FoQAio//WyIy5oU7AoI+E4isFOLC2Vx1kFg13lUNd0xTvvZ9HuzA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9crVhTclWvLFViVhIxRtAMb81MH/uLGbomJipw2fNX4=; b=pL2TD6PWxydcfb8jjqtZX6+IS6atdsfZciz0YahIwCei+3fXxej9CO+7aw+HNufsgG7x6YfVWBV1sKwyam6cA/rpbVTpsTTuq8g6PCrBDT76rorlhIc5nDh5f+OtS5cOwd8vk5ivzy2fiJzXkKutF9mkpNWjkKe9kEOYL5pvEfo=
Received: from AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.115.216) by AM0PR07MB4642.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.149.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2474.10; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:09:04 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8d07:c426:c2d7:51f2]) by AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8d07:c426:c2d7:51f2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.015; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:09:04 +0000
From: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
CC: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Taps] finishing things
Thread-Index: AQHVnVYRDZ2cOlZUtkag5A9HAx0/CA==
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:09:04 +0000
Message-ID: <015001d59ec1$4f9a80e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <33DEC7AC-738B-436B-A42E-FC1500033283@gmail.com> <024601d59d56$03820aa0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54F6C8B9-6F39-4315-B376-AA11D0B6F2E6@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: CWLP123CA0083.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:5b::23) To AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:11e::24)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=daedulus@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.211.103]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0b69a517-758a-4597-6090-08d76cd881d3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB4642:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB464298B182228F418B0601BDC64C0@AM0PR07MB4642.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 022649CC2C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(1556002)(476003)(14496001)(86362001)(14444005)(256004)(6916009)(71190400001)(186003)(446003)(3846002)(6246003)(6116002)(6486002)(71200400001)(4720700003)(44736005)(14454004)(26005)(8676002)(52116002)(6506007)(53546011)(81156014)(9686003)(6512007)(386003)(81166006)(76176011)(81816011)(81686011)(66066001)(99286004)(50226002)(8936002)(478600001)(102836004)(229853002)(316002)(4326008)(7736002)(66556008)(305945005)(64756008)(5660300002)(25786009)(62236002)(44716002)(66446008)(66476007)(486006)(66946007)(2906002)(6436002)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB4642; H:AM0PR07MB5716.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: t6nP68dF+Wk2CmtBHTajHwoB+AgAtIeHS9vHvQtUXYTzdWJyNpAQsKhpJNaiLvi91OyuU3jbzQ6BTDVOBHk+p0NMvDJI0Jzq6raBZg+/DRPi1QGy8P1E5FQnSYGCXBPeAJDf4YH5kUsuDug7YrXfcEtGKno5wbXjHJh6JmOa1X/0JpoFVIxTaA6+HT+te4SHVKIdSFWxBqfWnqBW3EmQ7UMXhLnrAm0hepne+UWj+5Scvel5oDR0dMEYsCcb1IMEQPFsLqb33YAk1aOI2Xm5gumu/amsyPJb3aLbuw/bDDConfybXzCxjWptruuJuu2H4Es9ZdXKdP1EbA9uUNRSQYS1g/pkM5Ee6WoEGIbMgnKNXcl+A7OZBAYEXIcF8mUwAEBiTjYuiTwpnYQIgGKAXXPyU61XJfMSYyMAYuZvg725YgOu+Q6l114qsKpk97gp
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BAE01D00B82CD24AA24C614D807A5587@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0b69a517-758a-4597-6090-08d76cd881d3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2019 10:09:04.4423 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cMrlc9/ocwvwPO5Fw5X+Ms7LL70+vr1mfC3Hl4+Y9P9j1A9UJnfCu7+7KVCD+avl7QUN4YMmJ5vjxpwAzDwAtw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB4642
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/11_FgX-P5YKPpmWU-PymSb1vvcA>
Subject: Re: [Taps] finishing things
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:09:09 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 2:28 AM

> On 17 Nov 2019, at 22:48, tom petch wrote:
>
> > I am not sure which three you have in mind but suspect that it does
> > not
> > include
> > draft-jholland-taps-api-yang
> >
> > Tom Petch
>
> Thanks for bringing this up, Tom.  Note that TAPS hasn’t adopted this
> draft as a working group item.  We have some options.  It could be
> absorbed into one of the TAPS docs if a) folks thought it was in-scope
> and sufficiently useful and b) it was mature enough.  If not, we could
> consider adopting it in TAPS as a new work item. I’d prefer that it
> did not slow down completion of the 3 wg drafts.  Thoughts?

I am still not sure which three I-Ds you have in mind!

The challenge with this I-D is that it may become dependent on common
security modules which emerge from Netconf at some future date; that
date could be a long way off.  I suggested to Jake that he should stay
with RYO security structures in which case I would see it as feasible to
incorporate it in the timescale you suggest, but that does depend on it
getting adequate review.

Tom Petch

> --aaron