[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 08 October 2023 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8137C151980 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="qGAWN0mI"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="gK0tp2cg"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOGqfg7fPQXw for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B48C151540 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 01:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B105C01F6 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 03:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Oct 2023 03:39:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1696750763; x=1696837163; bh=/s42CXv9SiBY/cAEa/oQdg8vWhavhBvictD 9VYhgPSk=; b=qGAWN0mIpewh9QiYHSOWhX7+Nvyd/velMxyePuJi0AneRXXZ3B0 FN1x8nfZitPFcLnLk/TWUXHbcgfQ8tkqRUlKIQJbu2cmDRlq9ElPZr2rjb1YqgS2 x5BVWAurZ0T4jRZy+xrQgZy+TFiCkGpTx58Ax2Z1J+Ob/kh5lg6DOHVw7TRNrDYw AeSFj62YJ5jfcn0xUbL7XAJcSrWnxz65m29ZfztP2G5Q6/d2UHYz1BLhRTkttmzn McmteY2QteP8T3vDitQ+dVkK8ay/MyKZnUCDUzIBUG9aYPWpJvgkM7YLEjwBMOmO lBAG90rrXMADLh8Z+FkUZbwgvTCsk2NFTkQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1696750763; x= 1696837163; bh=/s42CXv9SiBY/cAEa/oQdg8vWhavhBvictD9VYhgPSk=; b=g K0tp2cgWpjMCM+psrnwdLqL4F5qD5CajDLv91/TDt/V4MNkeChQDrdobnjUI2IpU DQrBg0tgkitsuRr4PhNPdzvdCQVrOH8hp18/3i5TwWyktSMYfrSiLbWWWlRNkCnM xzoBwS0w9vY2cNinkve+oR0tg1eT/m5fErZdN6cL/UoJaeMpt93RQx2kWMApH9CT cYd70FRHqXpsdJUw0rFHDnAF/kA8rElFazDTIAG2kJ4fxaxd9h/mZROwbd6B484e O1MMdsQrNWz8DBnSnD4n3/0EWLJ8nj4xzJziuTvG6mCv5jTtyIjIbzF+/O8JiZYg oknD2Sftx0r5VCLnIdGvA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qlwiZUSUqhQZWNhISa5lgL-n2hnWceM_wa0Evg2x3Bb9Yxzj9CPISw> <xme:qlwiZRxVfPzAq2DNMYQv3kOK6VQ8iU3VWzyHvfa2mANooMV4gkqcytU8h-ezs573j e9EexfqYL71r7VcvA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:qlwiZR29l-qMtgtfa5iL3RE5ag8uCBc9a_duk5UPtbg7-mzurpIosPDUxbvFGA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrhedtgdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qlwiZYD_IvgmGuqjCPKbgmCmtI2BWORRJb61z0RNzlJbBq4UVn1jwg> <xmx:qlwiZdiNt95KoDGC3zmXwNyAC0Om-wqL39fgCssWdaWel6xfNZ02gQ> <xmx:q1wiZUoRnlFq6ep1-JJVxVqN-LdtBB08x_ZgtUKbAnmLIQ_lwEdKkg> <xmx:q1wiZXePs-Vn-irCHr4xcHvdrjmWO7QVoe4tPBOdg6PjNeI0lt88jg>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 03:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0112105045955856650=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: taps@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20231008081546.F2B48C151540@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 01:15:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/24P4ygWsL1DgDvBWxt1yGcSqsKw>
Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 08:15:51 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-16/💬29)
  18 issues received 29 new comments:
  - #1378 Priority order (2 by gorryfair, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1378 [API] [From a partial review] 
  - #1363 Preconnection vs Listener (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1363 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] 
  - #1362 ALPN (2 by mwelzl, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1362 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] 
  - #1361 WithPort and WithService, but not WithProtocol (2 by gorryfair, mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1361 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] 
  - #1360 Hostname vs FQDN (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1360 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] 
  - #1357 Netflows vs. IP flows (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1357 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] 
  - #1347 Bounds on send and receive rate (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1347 [API] 
  - #1346 How to express "Full Coverage" (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1346 [API] 
  - #1338 Property names (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1338 [API] 
  - #1336 Contradicting Connection / Message properties (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1336 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - #1334 Complex interactions between properties (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1334 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - #1333 WithProtocol TCP/TLS in an example (6 by gorryfair, mwelzl, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1333 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - #1332 Usage of protocol identifiers (2 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1332 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - #1331 How does an application learn allowed/available interface names? (2 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1331 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - #1321 Why batch sends? (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1321 [Implementation] 
  - #1299 MPTCP (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1299 [Architecture] 
  - #1265 Normative language in section 5 (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1265 [API] [discuss] 
  - #1255 Security by default? (2 by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1255 [Architecture] 

  16 issues closed:
  - How are IETF namespaces to be differentiated? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1275 [API] 
  - Not just "IETF document in the RFC series" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1330 [API] [review - must reply] 
  - Normative language in section 5 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1265 [API] 
  - s/Collection/Set or Bag? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1280 [API] 
  - Add a (stronger?) statement about monitoring? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1279 [Architecture] 
  - Changing types of Selection Properties https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1281 [API] 
  - Format suggestion to avoid too long line https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1327 [Implementation] [editorial] [From a partial review] 
  - Example style https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1323 [Implementation] 
  - Connections don't resolve stuff https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1308 [API] [editorial] 
  - Leave the empty IANA section in there https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1295 [Architecture] [editorial] 
  - Two nits in -impl https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1319 [Implementation] 
  - nits https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1313 [API] [editorial] 
  - Editorial nit: "myVariableName" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1297 [API] [editorial] 
  - nit about simultaneous open text https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1291 [Architecture] 
  - A nit about MUXing text https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1293 [Architecture] [editorial] 
  - Message can be spread across multiple packets https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1292 [Architecture] 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+8/-8/💬7)
  8 pull requests submitted:
  - Make UTO more clearly a TCP example (by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1401 [API] 
  - Change hi<->lo priority (by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1400 
  - Add ALPN parameter (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1399 
  - Hostnames SHOULD be FQDNs (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1398 [API] 
  - Explain errors for message properties (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1397 [API] 
  - Could/Can/Might rather than may (by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1396 
  - Review of "should" in API (by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1395 
  - Make it clearer that Messages can be spread across multiple packets (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1394 [Architecture] 

  6 pull requests received 7 new comments:
  - #1400 Change hi<->lo priority (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1400 [API] 
  - #1395 Review of "should" in API (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1395 
  - #1393 Mention the Connection priority in the scheduler property description (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1393 [API] 
  - #1388 s/Collection/Set (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1388 
  - #1318 Create IANA registry for Tansport Property Namespace  (2 by martinduke, mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1318 [API] [discuss] 
  - #1306 A title change to The Transport Service System? (1 by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1306 [Architecture] 

  8 pull requests merged:
  - Create IANA registry for Tansport Property Namespace 
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1318 [API] [discuss] 
  - Review of "should" in API
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1395 
  - s/Collection/Set
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1388 [API] 
  - A statement about supporting monitoring
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1390 [Architecture] 
  - 2nd attempt at a Title Change
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1381 [Architecture] 
  - Non-Preference Selection Properties don't change their type
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1391 [API] 
  - Nits
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1392 [API] [Architecture] [Implementation] 
  - Make it clearer that Messages can be spread across multiple packets
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1394 [Architecture] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts