Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26
"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Sun, 16 January 2022 09:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E1B3A0F2F for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 01:15:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=trammell.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WAcmOlyhOdLB for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 01:15:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-42a8.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-42a8.mail.infomaniak.ch [84.16.66.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A57E3A0F35 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 01:15:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.4.36.108]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jc8Wm6HFczMptNf; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 10:15:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:169:17b2:0:f1de:8cf4:4443:93bc]) by smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Jc8Wm4TLyzlhMBY; Sun, 16 Jan 2022 10:15:16 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=trammell.ch; s=20191114; t=1642324516; bh=YeMPRLej7OAaScPju+HC0qkL5qgpmDwlVkrMwPrLqEQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=ntWtkokmo7HHUFu1kNmxcV95/RM5UU7iySkes0vzAI6E2d3Az7RgftsD4R2AOg8/y JowEZWkGMJ7Ajm2F5Lo0sGkIgM4ti5nyBqL15GLJIGqB/MXV6GnYu4T44DgRyUVRIl gTh88IJXstBPdtxXY8wqt8JXc8leeD36am0aQnHc=
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Message-Id: <5596D659-4DED-4B6A-8C62-4990E4D3C9CF@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_44E7CBE1-C29F-4156-B07C-2858ADE4DE77"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 10:15:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9X-XVObCdyf04j7MnmR4UZ3fJx1-G_qAN_xK+Ly=2+v=A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
References: <640F223D-ACCF-47FB-A131-4C3880AC3193@ericsson.com> <CAD62q9X-XVObCdyf04j7MnmR4UZ3fJx1-G_qAN_xK+Ly=2+v=A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/88dipq2CfOz1lFSKxnNuJjhyASQ>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:15:25 -0000
I’m planning on being there. If we reschedule, pushing to 2 Feb will work for me, but after that my next available Wednesday at the normal slot is 2 Mar. Cheers, Brian > On 15 Jan 2022, at 22:26, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS interim on Jan 26 at 11am EST reply to this message? Let’s see if we still have a critical mass. > > —aaron > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:26 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just notice that I have a conflict with the next meeting. In the first half we now scheduled an IESG/IAB workshop, which will also impact Tommy and Colin. And the second half collides with the joint ADD/DPRIVE/DNSOP interim meeting, which I guess also impacts Tommy and maybe others. > > You definitely don't have to move the meeting because of me but maybe it would be good to check again who would be actually able to join. > > Mirja > > > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org <mailto:Taps@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps> > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
- [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Aaron Falk
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Colin Perkins
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Anna Brunström
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Michael Welzl
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Reese Enghardt
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Gorry (erg)
- Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Tommy Pauly
- [Taps] Rescheduling to Feb 2 (Re: Conflict with n… Reese Enghardt