Re: [Taps] Should TAPS meet during IETF-108?

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 26 May 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1CE3A0788; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZgALYsmGfwe; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52243A07F5; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GF-MacBook-Pro.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B5681B00179; Tue, 26 May 2020 16:40:02 +0100 (BST)
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Cc: taps-ads@ietf.org, taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
References: <5A720526-CFF7-4F88-9BC3-2132A4412DFE@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nXzfY3v+KGxqrsjFskrLLY-Lz6t4JKCKUE08cZK0td_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <67a1d6a1-113f-8180-17c8-7e7ca54fc662@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:40:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nXzfY3v+KGxqrsjFskrLLY-Lz6t4JKCKUE08cZK0td_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------56D625C4892FB2312CEA712D"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/8VhgvB5Hs79ykkzA51Vo3EK728U>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Should TAPS meet during IETF-108?
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 15:40:26 -0000

I'm OK  during the weeek or to skip the next interim, as long as we keep 
a couple of weeks clear either side of the IETF "meeting week:, so I 
don't end up with the weeks of IETF meetings that happended last time.

Gorry

On 26/05/2020 15:42, Kyle Rose wrote:
> Agreed 100%. Leslie and I are also taking the approach for MOPS of an 
> interim in lieu of trying to cram our remote meeting into the official 
> single week for no good reason I can tell. We can schedule the meeting 
> for when it's convenient for participants, and probably also make it 
> easier for new folks with jobs to clear their schedules for an hour 
> here or there rather than an entire week at once without the travel 
> excuse.
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail..com 
> <mailto:aaron.falk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear TAPS working group & ADs,
>
>     Scheduling has begun for the online IETF-108 meeting in July.
>     Should we request a meeting slot for IETF week? Frankly, I can’t
>     think of a good reason to do so. We’ve been making good progress
>     with ~monthly Webex sessions and my hope is to continue them.
>     Trying to schedule a meeting during IETF week will only reduce
>     availability of participants. Thoughts?
>
>     --aaron
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Taps mailing list
>     Taps@ietf.org <mailto:Taps@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps