Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 02 July 2019 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C90120227 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5MDM-vDDEpb for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14FFA1201D7 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 00:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx12.uio.no ([129.240.10.84]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1hiD9P-0002pk-1x; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:24:27 +0200
Received: from 1x-193-157-246-178.uio.no ([193.157.246.178]) by mail-mx12.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1hiD9M-0008jM-Fc; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:24:26 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Message-Id: <2574F272-3141-4D84-A43F-ED464435F1C9@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91F535CF-FDC3-4325-8587-F3C4B869E0C4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:24:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <55D72312-E8A8-4BD4-86E5-E9D57A9ECA45@in-panik.de>
Cc: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
To: "Philipp S. Tiesel" <phils@in-panik.de>
References: <B5C441D6-096A-499D-A106-1C831FBD6000@gmail.com> <929381CF-E86F-41D5-B1BA-29C1B58171A9@ifi.uio.no> <55D72312-E8A8-4BD4-86E5-E9D57A9ECA45@in-panik.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx12.uio.no: 193.157.246.178 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=193.157.246.178; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=1x-193-157-246-178.uio.no;
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 1F228CED1DE3A7FB9C7C5B9B97DD3CACE40B8623
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/DE09u4Y13ITFXdr89DsS3VMjLa0>
Subject: Re: [Taps] call for TAPS agenda items
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 07:24:37 -0000

Hi again,

> On Jul 1, 2019, at 4:17 PM, Philipp S. Tiesel <phils@in-panik.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30. Jun 2019, at 23:44, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no <mailto:michawe@ifi.uio.no>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sounds like a good start!
>> 
>> About this:
>> 
>>> On Jun 30, 2019, at 11:34 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com <mailto:aaron.falk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What shall we use our face-time for in Montreal?
>>> 
>>> Some topics from our last interim <https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/nots-interim-2019-taps-02?useMonospaceFont=true> seem like good candidates for updates. Can we refine them with specific to discuss (and ID someone to launch/lead the discussion)?
>>> 
>>> Framing
>>> Implementations
>>> Parameters & Defaults
I’d volunteer for this one too.


>>> Yang model
>>> Why do people resist specific protocol selection? (from Yang discussion)
>> I’d volunteer to lead this discussion, but I wonder: is this really worth the time - as in: do we really (still) have any resistance to this idea?
> 
> Looks like… but I guess we have two different topics here:
>  - Property Profiles (shortcuts for common sets of properties)
>  - Explicit Protocol Selection
> 
> I originally insisted to keep them separate, as I really like to have the first one and feared the discussion for the second one. As I opened PRs with proposals for both of them (https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/328 <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/328> and https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/327 <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/327>), I got no fire and fury, but only constructive feedback.
> So I agree with Michael that we may really have a short discussion on whether to add these features.

Ok, it sounds to me like this slot should be called “Profiles / choosing specific protocols”.  Sounds like a nice short discussion to me.


Cheers,
Michael


> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>>> ARCH & API open topics
>>> --aaron
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> Taps@ietf.org <mailto:Taps@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> Taps@ietf.org <mailto:Taps@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
> 
> AVE!
>    Philipp S. Tiesel
> 
> -- 
> Philipp S. Tiesel 
> https://philipp.tiesel.net/ <https://philipp.tiesel.net/>